Data for 2014
Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2014
2014, as ILO’s 2026 release gives it · stored as published, never rewritten
Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2014 covers 66 countries on 3 measures. Albania is highest, at 42.89; Thailand is lowest, at 1.52. The middle country reads 15.53.
Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4) · Data for 2014
HighestAlbania
42.89LowestThailand
1.52Shaded by value in five groups of equal size, darkest at the lowest end. A higher value is the worse result.
01Position · derived
The table
Every country and every column of Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2014, as published. ILO ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. “=” marks a shared position.
Showing 25 of 66 countries · select a heading to sort
| derived | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 42.89 | 46.33 | 39.97 | — | |
| 2 | 39.93 | 45.23 | 34.33 | Break in series | |
| 3 | 39.19 | 45.18 | 34.97 | — | |
| 4 | 38.10 | 42.38 | 34.40 | — | |
| 5 | 37.88 | 37.71 | 38.09 | Break in series | |
| 6 | 35.99 | 41.45 | 31.11 | — | |
| 7 | 34.41 | 36.00 | 33.13 | Break in series | |
| 8 | 34.16 | 39.77 | 29.63 | — | |
| 9 | 33.89 | 35.16 | 33.02 | — | |
| 10 | 32.15 | 67.88 | 26.02 | Break in series | |
| 11 | 31.91 | 32.15 | 31.67 | — | |
| 12 | 29.17 | 39.02 | 25.37 | — | |
| 13 | 28.98 | 39.28 | 20.78 | — | |
| 14 | 28.35 | 28.81 | 27.97 | — | |
| 15 | 27.10 | 29.28 | 25.13 | — | |
| 16 | 26.80 | 31.58 | 22.98 | — | |
| 17 | 25.96 | 27.88 | 24.10 | — | |
| 18 | 25.54 | 34.07 | 19.45 | — | |
| 19 | 25.32 | 31.09 | 20.89 | — | |
| 20 | 21.49 | 23.85 | 19.28 | — | |
| 21 | 20.65 | 20.78 | 20.51 | — | |
| 22 | 20.60 | 20.41 | 20.76 | — | |
| 23 | 19.10 | 19.14 | 19.06 | — | |
| 24 | 18.91 | 18.72 | 19.10 | — | |
| 25 | 18.84 | 17.88 | 19.67 | — | |
| 26 | 18.57 | 22.35 | 15.27 | — | |
| 27 | 18.53 | 20.19 | 17.10 | — | |
| 28 | 17.93 | 22.83 | 14.34 | — | |
| 29 | 17.40 | 22.14 | 13.23 | — | |
| 30 | 16.86 | 21.45 | 12.90 | — | |
| 31 | 15.97 | 21.04 | 12.16 | — | |
| 32 | 15.67 | 16.92 | 14.54 | — | |
| 33 | 15.55 | 17.97 | 13.65 | Break in series | |
| 34 | 15.52 | 17.48 | 13.78 | — | |
| 35 | 15.43 | 17.68 | 13.57 | — | |
| 36 | 14.85 | 16.98 | 13.08 | — | |
| 37 | 14.63 | 15.71 | 13.70 | — | |
| 38 | 14.43 | 13.51 | 15.36 | — | |
| 39 | 14.42 | 18.41 | 11.37 | — | |
| 40 | 14.35 | 23.59 | 8.43 | — | |
| 41 | 13.89 | 15.55 | 12.36 | — | |
| 42 | 13.70 | 15.63 | 11.98 | — | |
| 43 | 13.64 | 12.75 | 14.27 | — | |
| 44 | 13.55 | 16.97 | 10.65 | — | |
| 45 | 13.35 | 14.11 | 12.70 | — | |
| 46 | 13.08 | 12.29 | 13.69 | — | |
| 47 | 12.90 | 12.97 | 12.82 | — | |
| 48 | 12.13 | 15.37 | 9.82 | — | |
| 49 | 12.09 | 13.18 | 11.11 | — | |
| 50 | 11.87 | 16.81 | 8.66 | — | |
| 51 | 11.44 | 15.01 | 7.45 | — | |
| 52 | 11.21 | 12.98 | 9.67 | — | |
| 53 | 10.98 | 11.55 | 10.61 | — | |
| 54 | 9.40 | 9.40 | 9.41 | — | |
| 55 | 9.32 | 8.33 | 10.51 | — | |
| 56 | 9.31 | 13.29 | 7.11 | Break in series | |
| 57 | 9.26 | 10.36 | 8.51 | — | |
| 58 | 9.07 | 10.17 | 8.09 | — | |
| 59 | 8.25 | 8.06 | 8.42 | — | |
| 60 | 8.00 | 10.10 | 6.34 | — | |
| 61 | 7.99 | 11.00 | 5.52 | — | |
| 62 | 6.29 | 9.28 | 4.68 | — | |
| 63 | 5.48 | 4.55 | 6.53 | — | |
| 64 | 4.54 | 4.52 | 4.56 | — | |
| 65 | 4.21 | 4.00 | 4.41 | — | |
| 66 | 1.52 | 1.37 | 1.65 | — |
02In 2014
At either end
The 5 countries at each end of the headline, then the highest and lowest on each other measure.
Highest
- 1
Albania42.89
- 2
Armenia39.93
- 3
Bosnia and Herzegovina39.19
- 4
South Africa38.10
- 5
Rwanda37.88
Lowest
- 66
Thailand1.52
- 65
Vietnam4.21
- 64
South Korea4.54
- 63
Moldova5.48
- 62
Sri Lanka6.29
A higher value is the worse result. The middle country reads 15.53. “Shared” marks a value another country also holds.
Each measure’s ends
03Caveats
Read before you use
What this edition’s numbers are and are not, worked out from the file itself.
One year of the 2026 release
Every year in this series comes from ILO’s 2026 release, recalculated on one method. It can differ from what was first published for 2014.
The position is ours
ILO publishes values only. The order here sorts the published values, and the page says so wherever it prints one.
Which end is better
A higher value is the worse result.
60 empty cells
An empty cell means the publisher gave no figure. It is never a zero.
Some readings carry a flag
ILO marks readings it considers estimates or provisional. The flags in this file: Break in series.
04The files
Download and cite
The table as a file, digit for digit, what this site changed, and a citation for this edition.
- .csv
For a spreadsheet or code
66 rows · 3.7 KB · UTF-8, opens in Excel
Opens with 11 lines of source notes; the table starts on row 13.
Download labour-underutilisation-2014-nations-inquiry.csv - ↗
The publisher’s original
ILO’s own file, on its own site.
https://rplumber.ilo.org/data/indicator/?id=LUU_XLU4_SEX_RT&format=.csv&channel=ilostat
What this site changed: Reshaped into one row per country: regional and income-group totals are left out, only the columns listed are kept, each row gets its ISO 3166 code, and some country names are brought to one spelling. No value is recalculated, rescaled or rounded.
Licence: CC BY 4.0. Share, adapt and use commercially. Credit the publisher and say if you changed anything.
Cite this edition
International Labour Organization (ILO) (2014). Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2014 [data set], describing 2014. As held by Nations Inquiry, https://nationsinquiry.com/datasets/labour-underutilisation/2014
0511 held
Other years
‹ The year before
This is the first year held here.
The year after ›
Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 201562 countries
All of them
Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4): every year11 held, with the data dictionary, coverage and licence.
How it has moved, charted by country
06Questions
Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2014: questions and answers
Which country has the highest labour underutilisation in Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2014?
Albania, at 42.89, of the 66 countries in the file.
What year does Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2014 describe?
2014.
How many countries does Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2014 cover?
66.
Where can I download Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2014?
On this page, as a CSV file holding every value exactly as published, or from the publisher’s own site, linked below.
Is Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2014 the newest?
No. The newest held here is Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2024.