Independent rankings built from public data — every figure traceable to the body that published it.
Topic 01 of 18 · Country Index 2026
How well is the state actually run?
Denmark is placed first of 194 countries on governance & institutions in the Country Index 2026, and Venezuela 194th. The standing rests on 4 key statistics; the other 30 on this page are published as context, with no vote.
01
4 key statistics
01Country Index 2026
The three countries placed highest of 194, the three placed lowest, and the country placed highest on each continent. Each position is a place in this topic’s own list, built from its key statistics.
1Denmark
Northern Europe
1st of 194 · 4 of 4 keys
Photo: User:Aconcagua · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale
2New Zealand
Australia and New Zealand
2nd of 194 · 4 of 4 keys
Photo: Karora derivative work: Inkey · Public domain, greyscale
3Sweden
Northern Europe
3rd of 194 · 4 of 4 keys
Photo: User:Pieter Kuiper · Public domain, greyscale
Positions out of 194. A standing is relative: it says where a country places against the others measured, not that it scored zero.
02The subject
How well a state is actually run: whether the law binds those who write it, how much corruption the people who deal with government perceive, how competently public administration delivers, and whether the statute book treats citizens equally. These measure institutions rather than politics — a country can hold elections and still govern badly, and the reverse.
Governance is about the machinery of the state rather than who controls it. A government can be elected or not, left or right, large or small, and still be honest or corrupt, competent or chaotic. This topic asks the second set of questions: whether the people who deal with officials meet corruption, whether public services and the civil service deliver what they promise, whether a government keeps to the policies it announces, and whether those who hold power are themselves bound by the constitution and the courts.
It also asks something less visible but just as telling: whether a state knows its own country. A government that cannot count its population, publish its statistics openly or put modern data tools to work is governing partly blind, and every other public service inherits that blindness. Capacity and honesty are measured separately here because a state can have one without the other.
What this topic does not measure
Governance is not democracy. Free elections, civil liberties and press freedom belong to the Democracy & Civil Liberties topic, and a country can place well on one and poorly on the other. How openly official data is published sits here as context, beside the statistical capacity that is a key. Nor does this topic measure the size of government or how much it spends — the share of the economy run by the state is published on this page as context, with no better end.
03The evidence
These are the only statistics that place countries on governance & institutions — one vote each. Every number is somebody else’s research, reproduced without adjustment; the ordering on top is this site’s.
Key 1 of 4
World Bank Group
Why it is a key: The quality of public services and the civil service that delivers them, and the credibility of a government's commitment to its own policies. Where the Corruption Perceptions Index asks whether a state is honest, this asks whether it is competent.
Current leader, 2025 editionSingapore
Key 2 of 4
World Bank Group
Why it is a key: Whether a state can measure its own country. Nothing else here tests the capacity of the statistical system itself.
Current leader, 2024 editionNorway
Key 3 of 4
Transparency International
Why it is a key: How much corruption the people who actually deal with a government perceive — an outcome, where the other keys measure the state’s capacity and the limits the law puts on it.
Current leader, 2025 editionDenmark
Key 4 of 4
V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg
Why it is a key: Whether the executive respects the constitution and obeys the courts, and whether the courts can rule against it freely — the law binding those who write it.
Current leader, 2025 editionAustralia
How the keys combine
Each country’s value on each key becomes its place in that key’s own field, as a share of the field. The shares are averaged, one vote per key, and only the order that produces is published.
The method in full04Every placed country
Darker is placed higher. Hover a country for its position, or select it to open its page. Below the map, each continent’s median position — half its placed countries sit at or above it, so lower is better.
1st of 5 continents
33rd
median position, of 194 · 41 of its 49 countries placed
HighestDenmark
2nd of 5 continents
91st
median position, of 194 · 35 of its 48 countries placed
HighestCanada
3rd of 5 continents
99th
median position, of 194 · 50 of its 52 countries placed
HighestJapan
4th of 5 continents
121st
median position, of 194 · 14 of its 21 countries placed
HighestNew Zealand
5th of 5 continents
146th
median position, of 194 · 54 of its 55 countries placed
HighestSeychelles
05The whole field
In order, best first. A row resting on fewer keys rests on less evidence: a country needs 2 of the 4 to be placed at all. “=” marks a position shared with another country. Select a country to see the working behind its standing.
Showing 25 of 194 countries placed on Governance & Institutions
Each holds readings on too few of this topic’s key statistics to be placed. Their profiles still show every reading the publishers give.
06Beyond the headline
The countries placed furthest above and below their overall position in the Country Index 2026. Both positions are compared as a share of their own field, because 50th of 193 and 50th of 174 are not the same showing.
07In records
One country at the extreme of a statistic under this topic, read from its newest edition. Where countries tie at the top, no record is named.
Perceived as least corrupt
89
on Transparency International’s 0–100 scale
Most effective government
2.092
on the World Bank’s −2.5 to 2.5 scale
Strongest national statistics
94.14
on the World Bank’s 0–100 SPI scale
08Latest editions
The biggest moves between each report’s two newest editions, in the publisher’s own ranks — reports under this topic that print a rank. A report whose field changed by more than 5% is left out.
Ranks as published by Transparency International in the Corruption Perceptions Index: the 2024 edition (180 countries ranked) → the 2025 edition (182 ranked).
Ranks as published by Oxford Insights in the Government AI Readiness Index: the 2024 edition (188 countries ranked) → the 2025 edition (195 ranked).
Ranks as published by Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative (ND-GAIN), University of Notre Dame in the Climate Readiness (ND-GAIN): reference years 2023 (192 countries ranked) → 2024 (192 ranked), both from its 2026 report.
Ranks as published by Open Data Watch in the Open Data Inventory: the 2022 edition (167 countries ranked) → the 2024 edition (168 ranked).
09Context, no vote
30 more statistics on the same subject, published in full and deliberately given no vote — keeping them out is what stops the standing drifting toward whichever kind of statistic was imported most. Select a row for its leader and trend.
Current leader:Denmark
World Bank Group · 27 editions, data 1996–2025
Current leader:Finland
World Bank Group · 27 editions, data 1996–2025
Current leader:Singapore
World Bank Group · 27 editions, data 1996–2025
International Labour Organization (ILO) · 1 edition
Current leader:Norway
World Bank Group · 27 editions, data 1996–2025
Current leader:South Korea
World Bank Group · 2 editions, data 2022–2025
Current leader:United States
Oxford Insights · 6 editions, data 2020–2025
Current leader:Singapore
Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative (ND-GAIN), University of Notre Dame · 30 editions, data 1995–2024
World Bank Group · 54 editions, data 1971–2024
UNICEF · 1 edition
Current leader:Denmark
V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 36 editions, data 1990–2025
Most affected:Venezuela
V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 36 editions, data 1990–2025
Current leader:Denmark
V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 36 editions, data 1990–2025
V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · 36 editions, data 1990–2025
Open Data Watch · 7 editions, data 2015–2024
Current leader:Iceland
International Labour Organization (ILO) · 1 edition
Current leader:Singapore
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) · 24 editions, data 2001–2024
Current leader:Kiribati
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) · 51 editions, data 1971–2023
Most affected:Mozambique
World Bank Group · 44 editions, data 1981–2024
Most affected:El Salvador
World Bank Group · 43 editions, data 1982–2024
Current leader:Rwanda
World Bank Group · 21 editions, data 2005–2025
Current leader:South Korea
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) · 24 editions, data 1999–2022
These have no better end — more is not better or worse, only different — so they could not place countries even as keys.
Highest:Bosnia and Herzegovina
Ana Carolina Garriga, University of Essex · 54 editions, data 1970–2023
Highest:Ukraine
World Bank Group · 56 editions, data 1970–2025
10Analysis
11Keep reading
Rank correlation of the two topics’ positions across the countries placed on both: 1 means the same order, 0 no link. Every pair of topics
12Method
Denmark, of the 194 countries given a standing on Governance & Institutions. The standing is this site’s own, built from 4 key statistics by 12 publishers; it is not a rank any of those publishers printed.
Venezuela, 194th of 194. A standing says how a country places against the others measured alongside it, so it moves when they move.
Government Effectiveness, Statistical Performance Indicators, Corruption Perceptions Index, Judicial Constraints on the Executive Index. Each is read at one edition and turned into a place within its own field; the places are averaged with one vote each. The other 30 statistics on this topic are published as context and have no vote.
A country needs readings on at least 2 of the 4 key statistics before it is placed. 30 countries in the Country Index fall short on this topic; every reading the publishers do give for them is still on their profiles.
The underlying numbers and any printed ranks are the publishers’, reproduced without adjustment on each statistic’s page. The standing that combines them is this site’s, and the average it is ordered by is never published — only the position it produces.
A standing is a place in a list, not a mark out of anything. This one is part of the Country Index 2026, and it is worked out like this.
The other 30 statistics on this page come from 11 publishers, each named beside its numbers, with every edition and licence on the datasets pages.
The standing itself is part of the Country Index 2026, published under CC BY-SA 4.0.
The countries placed highest, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.
Nations Inquiry (2026). Governance & Institutions: country standings, Country Index 2026. https://nationsinquiry.com/topics/governance