Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

Data for 2020

Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2020

2020, as ILO’s 2026 release gives it · stored as published, never rewritten

Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2020 covers 69 countries on 3 measures. Honduras is highest, at 49.82; Thailand is lowest, at 2.99. The middle country reads 16.06. Against 2019, 65 values changed (56 up, 9 down), 4 countries joined, 21 left.

Share

Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4) · Data for 2020

HighestHonduras

49.82

LowestThailand

2.99

Shaded by value in five groups of equal size, darkest at the lowest end. A higher value is the worse result.

01Position · derived

The table

Every country and every column of Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2020, as published. ILO ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. “=” marks a shared position.

Showing 25 of 69 countries · select a heading to sort

Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2020: every country, as published by International Labour Organization (ILO).
derived
1HondurasHNDCentral America49.8263.2236.086Break in series
2South AfricaZAFSouthern Africa45.7849.7742.278—
3Costa RicaCRICentral America41.5548.8536.292—
4AfghanistanAFGSouthern Asia40.3062.0632.092Break in series
5RwandaRWAEastern Africa40.2045.7034.502—
6PalestinePSEWestern Asia36.3057.0229.983—
7AngolaAGOMiddle Africa32.8934.2431.432—
8ChileCHLSouth America31.8436.4428.289Break in series
9MontenegroMNESouthern Europe31.2832.6230.169—
10GuyanaGUYSouth America29.2733.9725.598—
11BrazilBRASouth America28.3834.1123.757—
12New CaledoniaNCLMelanesia28.0130.6425.684—
13ItalyITASouthern Europe26.2430.1623.148—
14SpainESPSouthern Europe25.8930.9121.356—
15Bosnia and HerzegovinaBIHSouthern Europe25.7631.3521.779Break in series
16North MacedoniaMKDSouthern Europe24.7525.0824.519—
17AlbaniaALBSouthern Europe24.2925.1423.573—
18GreeceGRCSouthern Europe24.1629.7819.463—
19GrenadaGRDCaribbean23.9729.2019.398—
20JordanJORWestern Asia23.8133.1721.777—
21GeorgiaGEOWestern Asia23.5622.6524.375Break in series
22UruguayURYSouth America21.2824.2918.610Break in series
23SerbiaSRBSouthern Europe20.3821.2319.687—
24PhilippinesPHLSouth-eastern Asia19.1517.8419.962—
25ZambiaZMBEastern Africa19.0321.1017.075—

02In 2020

At either end

The 5 countries at each end of the headline, then the highest and lowest on each other measure.

Highest

  1. 1Honduras49.82
  2. 2South Africa45.78
  3. 3Costa Rica41.55
  4. 4Afghanistan40.30
  5. 5Rwanda40.20

Lowest

  1. 69Thailand2.99
  2. 68Myanmar3.50
  3. 67Czechia3.69
  4. 66Moldova3.79
  5. 65Vietnam4.60

A higher value is the worse result. The middle country reads 16.06. “Shared” marks a value another country also holds.

Each measure’s ends

032019 → 2020

Since 2019

What changed between 2019 and this one: who joined or left, and how far the headline moved.

  • +4 / −21countries joined / left
  • 65values changed, of 65 in both
  • 56 · 9rose · fell
  • 0unchanged

Rose most

Fell most

+ Afghanistan+ Grenada+ Mali+ Montserrat− United Arab Emirates− Bolivia− Barbados− Côte d’Ivoire− Cook Islands− Colombia− Guatemala− Kenya− Cambodia− Lebanon− Lesotho− Maldives− Marshall Islands− Mauritius− Nigeria− Panama− Senegal− Somalia− Tunisia− Vanuatu− Zimbabwe

Both years come from the same release, so a difference here is a change in the data, not a revision of it. Every country’s full history is charted on the statistic page.

04Caveats

Read before you use

What this edition’s numbers are and are not, worked out from the file itself.

The site’s method
  • One year of the 2026 release

    Every year in this series comes from ILO’s 2026 release, recalculated on one method. It can differ from what was first published for 2020.

  • The position is ours

    ILO publishes values only. The order here sorts the published values, and the page says so wherever it prints one.

  • Which end is better

    A higher value is the worse result.

  • 61 empty cells

    An empty cell means the publisher gave no figure. It is never a zero.

  • Some readings carry a flag

    ILO marks readings it considers estimates or provisional. The flags in this file: Break in series.

05The files

Download and cite

The table as a file, digit for digit, what this site changed, and a citation for this edition.

Licence in full

What this site changed: Reshaped into one row per country: regional and income-group totals are left out, only the columns listed are kept, each row gets its ISO 3166 code, and some country names are brought to one spelling. No value is recalculated, rescaled or rounded.

Licence: CC BY 4.0. Share, adapt and use commercially. Credit the publisher and say if you changed anything.

Cite this edition

International Labour Organization (ILO) (2020). Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2020 [data set], describing 2020. As held by Nations Inquiry, https://nationsinquiry.com/datasets/labour-underutilisation/2020

0611 held

Other years

07Questions

Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2020: questions and answers

Which country has the highest labour underutilisation in Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2020?

Honduras, at 49.82, of the 69 countries in the file.

What year does Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2020 describe?

2020.

How many countries does Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2020 cover?

69.

Where can I download Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2020?

On this page, as a CSV file holding every value exactly as published, or from the publisher’s own site, linked below.

Is Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2020 the newest?

No. The newest held here is Composite Rate of Labour Underutilisation (LU4), 2024.

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.