Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

Data for 2010

Contraceptive Prevalence (Any Method), 2010

2010, as UN DESA Population Division’s 2024 release gives it · stored as published, never rewritten

Contraceptive Prevalence (Any Method), 2010 covers 196 countries on 3 measures. Finland is highest, at 75.1; Chad is lowest, at 4.6. The middle country reads 38.3. Against 2009, 174 values changed (129 up, 45 down), the same countries are covered.

Download CSVCite this year
Share

Share this page

Contraceptive Prevalence (Any Method) · Data for 2010

HighestFinland

75.1

LowestChad

4.6

Shaded by value in five groups of equal size, darkest at the highest end. Neither end is better. The values describe a shape, not a score.

01Values only

The table

Every country and every column of Contraceptive Prevalence (Any Method), 2010, as published. The file carries values only, so no position is shown. “=” marks a shared position.

Showing 25 of 196 countries · select a heading to sort

Contraceptive Prevalence (Any Method), 2010: every country, as published by UN DESA Population Division.
FinlandFINNorthern Europe75.163.980.3Interpolation
SwitzerlandCHEWestern Europe73.266.778.7Interpolation
CanadaCANNorthern America72.859.283.3Projection
United KingdomGBRNorthern Europe72.764.379.2Interpolation
NorwayNORNorthern Europe69.654.186.4Projection
CubaCUBCaribbean67.861.273.4Interpolation
ChinaCHNEastern Asia67.260.380.1Interpolation
FranceFRAWestern Europe67.061.571.9Interpolation
BulgariaBGREastern Europe66.653.279.1Projection
BrazilBRASouth America65.760.870.4Interpolation
IrelandIRLNorthern Europe65.052.071.4Interpolation
NetherlandsNLDWestern Europe63.856.369.2Interpolation
DenmarkDNKNorthern Europe63.441.685.1Projection
SpainESPSouthern Europe63.457.868.6Interpolation
AustriaAUTWestern Europe63.352.172.9Interpolation
New ZealandNZLAustralia and New Zealand62.750.277.6Interpolation
CzechiaCZEEastern Europe61.749.377.0Projection
United StatesUSANorthern America61.254.567.5Interpolation
PortugalPRTSouthern Europe60.450.468.3Interpolation
GermanyDEUWestern Europe59.050.469.8Interpolation
BelgiumBELWestern Europe58.752.365.2Interpolation
SwedenSWENorthern Europe58.742.977.9Interpolation
ColombiaCOLSouth America58.155.061.4Interpolation
LatviaLVANorthern Europe57.834.382.6Projection
ItalyITASouthern Europe57.745.767.3Interpolation

02In 2010

At either end

The 5 countries at each end of the headline, then the highest and lowest on each other measure.

Highest

  1. Finland75.1
  2. Switzerland73.2
  3. Canada72.8
  4. United Kingdom72.7
  5. Norway69.6

Lowest

  1. Chad4.6
  2. South Sudan4.8
  3. Eritrea5.5
  4. Somalia5.6
  5. Sudan7.3

Neither end is better. The values describe a shape, not a score. The middle country reads 38.3. “Shared” marks a value another country also holds.

Each measure’s ends

  • Lower bound (95% uncertainty interval)

    HighestSwitzerland66.7

    LowestSouth Sudan3.5

    Middle country: 30.3

  • Upper bound (95% uncertainty interval)

    HighestNorway86.4

    LowestChad5.9

    Middle country: 46.8

032009 → 2010

Since 2009

What changed between 2009 and this one: who joined or left, and how far the headline moved.

  • +0 / −0countries joined / left
  • 174values changed, of 196 in both
  • 129 · 45rose · fell
  • 22unchanged

Rose most

Fell most

Both years come from the same release, so a difference here is a change in the data, not a revision of it. Every country’s full history is charted on the statistic page.

04Caveats

Read before you use

What this edition’s numbers are and are not, worked out from the file itself.

The site’s method

  • One year of the 2024 release

    Every year in this series comes from UN DESA Population Division’s 2024 release, recalculated on one method. It can differ from what was first published for 2010.

  • 168 distinct values among 196

    Values are stored exactly as published, to 1 decimal. 3 countries share 40.3. Countries sharing a value share a position too.

  • Which end is better

    Neither end is better. The values describe a shape, not a score.

  • Nothing missing

    Every one of the 196 countries has every column.

  • Some readings carry a flag

    UN DESA Population Division marks readings it considers estimates or provisional. The flags in this file: Interpolation, Projection.

05The files

Download and cite

The table as a file, digit for digit, what this site changed, and a citation for this edition.

Licence in full

What this site changed: Reshaped into one row per country: regional and income-group totals are left out, only the columns listed are kept, each row gets its ISO 3166 code, and some country names are brought to one spelling. No value is recalculated, rescaled or rounded.

Licence: CC BY 3.0 IGO. The version of CC BY written for intergovernmental organisations. Credit the publisher and say what you changed.

Cite this edition

UN DESA Population Division (2010). Contraceptive Prevalence (Any Method), 2010 [data set], describing 2010. As held by Nations Inquiry, https://nationsinquiry.com/datasets/contraceptive-prevalence/2010

0634 held

Other years

07Questions

Contraceptive Prevalence (Any Method), 2010: questions and answers

Which country has the highest contraceptive use in Contraceptive Prevalence (Any Method), 2010?

Finland, at 75.1, of the 196 countries in the file.

What year does Contraceptive Prevalence (Any Method), 2010 describe?

2010.

How many countries does Contraceptive Prevalence (Any Method), 2010 cover?

196.

Where can I download Contraceptive Prevalence (Any Method), 2010?

On this page, as a CSV file holding every value exactly as published, or from the publisher’s own site, linked below.

Is Contraceptive Prevalence (Any Method), 2010 the newest?

No. The newest held here is Contraceptive Prevalence (Any Method), 2023.

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.