Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Deliberative Democracy Index

Deliberative democracy by country

Are political decisions reached through reasoned public debate?

Denmark placed first of the 176 countries compared in 2025, at 0.867, and North Korea last, at 0.011. In the middle country the figure was 0.339. Among the 167 countries measured in every edition since 1990, the middle one moved from 0.225 to 0.330.

Part ofDemocracy & Civil Liberties

Deliberative democracy · 2025

Context statistic

Highest of 176Denmark

0.867

012025 · position · derived

Who leads

The three countries at the highest end of 176 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.

  1. 1

    Denmark

    Northern Europe

    0.867

    1st of 176

    Photo: User:Aconcagua · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale

  2. 2

    Norway

    Northern Europe

    0.863

    2nd of 176

    Photo: Ximonic , Simo Räsänen · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale

  3. 3

    Switzerland

    Western Europe

    0.852

    3rd of 176

    Photo: Simon Koopmann derivative work: Jjtkk · CC BY-SA 2.0 de, greyscale

Lowest in 2025

  1. 176North Korea0.011
  2. 175Afghanistan0.012
  3. 174Nicaragua0.017

Positions out of 176. Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.

Highest on each continent

02Every measured country

Deliberative democracy on a map

Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.

All regions

Darker is a higher value — the better end.

  • 0.011–0.126
  • 0.129–0.248
  • 0.251–0.412
  • 0.416–0.647
  • 0.651–0.867
  • No reading in 2025
  • Europe

    0.658

    the middle country, of 40 measured · 49 members

    Denmark0.867

    Belarus0.032

    Highest and lowest reading in Europe.

  • Americas

    0.458

    the middle country, of 27 measured · 48 members

    Costa Rica0.787

    Nicaragua0.017

    Highest and lowest reading in Americas.

  • Oceania

    0.437

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 21 members

    Australia0.771

    Papua New Guinea0.248

    Highest and lowest reading in Oceania.

  • Africa

    0.228

    the middle country, of 55 measured · 55 members

    Seychelles0.703

    Sudan0.023

    Highest and lowest reading in Africa.

  • Asia

    0.182

    the middle country, of 48 measured · 52 members

    South Korea0.751

    North Korea0.011

    Highest and lowest reading in Asia.

20 sub-regions, highest middle country first
  • Western Europe

    0.790

    the middle country, of 7 measured · 9 members

    Switzerland0.852

    Austria0.729

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Europe.

  • Northern Europe

    0.760

    the middle country, of 10 measured · 13 members

    Denmark0.867

    Lithuania0.662

    Highest and lowest reading in Northern Europe.

  • Caribbean

    0.625

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 24 members

    Barbados0.712

    Cuba0.097

    Highest and lowest reading in Caribbean.

  • Southern Europe

    0.521

    the middle country, of 13 measured · 17 members

    Spain0.693

    Serbia0.208

    Highest and lowest reading in Southern Europe.

  • Southern Africa

    0.464

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members

    South Africa0.651

    Eswatini0.064

    Highest and lowest reading in Southern Africa.

  • Eastern Asia

    0.448

    the middle country, of 7 measured · 8 members

    South Korea0.751

    North Korea0.011

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Asia.

  • South America

    0.393

    the middle country, of 12 measured · 12 members

    Uruguay0.784

    Venezuela0.023

    Highest and lowest reading in South America.

  • Central America

    0.358

    the middle country, of 7 measured · 8 members

    Costa Rica0.787

    Nicaragua0.017

    Highest and lowest reading in Central America.

  • Eastern Europe

    0.344

    the middle country, of 10 measured · 10 members

    Czechia0.703

    Belarus0.032

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Europe.

  • Western Africa

    0.296

    the middle country, of 16 measured · 16 members

    Ghana0.583

    Burkina Faso0.048

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Africa.

  • Southern Asia

    0.259

    the middle country, of 9 measured · 9 members

    Sri Lanka0.621

    Afghanistan0.012

    Highest and lowest reading in Southern Asia.

  • Northern Africa

    0.222

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 6 members

    Tunisia0.330

    Sudan0.023

    Highest and lowest reading in Northern Africa.

  • South-eastern Asia

    0.222

    the middle country, of 10 measured · 11 members

    Timor-Leste0.540

    Myanmar0.035

    Highest and lowest reading in South-eastern Asia.

  • Eastern Africa

    0.195

    the middle country, of 19 measured · 19 members

    Seychelles0.703

    Eritrea0.025

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Africa.

  • Western Asia

    0.166

    the middle country, of 17 measured · 19 members

    Cyprus0.613

    Azerbaijan0.034

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Asia.

  • Middle Africa

    0.163

    the middle country, of 9 measured · 9 members

    São Tomé and Príncipe0.416

    Equatorial Guinea0.045

    Highest and lowest reading in Middle Africa.

  • Central Asia

    0.146

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members

    Kazakhstan0.185

    Turkmenistan0.028

    Highest and lowest reading in Central Asia.

  • Australia and New Zealand

    2 of 2 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.

    Australia0.771

    New Zealand0.644

    Highest and lowest reading in Australia and New Zealand.

  • Melanesia

    4 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu.

    Vanuatu0.467

    Papua New Guinea0.248

    Highest and lowest reading in Melanesia.

  • Northern America

    2 of 4 measured — too few for a middle: Canada, United States.

    Canada0.677

    United States0.481

    Highest and lowest reading in Northern America.

03The whole field at once

The spread

176 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 0.339; a quarter are above 0.604, and a quarter below 0.169. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.

0.20.40.60.8Africa55 comparedSeychelles: 0.703Mauritius: 0.663South Africa: 0.651Ghana: 0.583Senegal: 0.555Cabo Verde: 0.549Gambia: 0.486Liberia: 0.485Lesotho: 0.482Malawi: 0.468Namibia: 0.464Kenya: 0.454Sierra Leone: 0.433São Tomé and Príncipe: 0.416Zambia: 0.412Botswana: 0.350Nigeria: 0.348Tunisia: 0.330Benin: 0.304Somaliland: 0.301Tanzania: 0.290Togo: 0.288Morocco: 0.278Libya: 0.261Niger: 0.253Côte d’Ivoire: 0.241Mauritania: 0.228Uganda: 0.228Gabon: 0.227Zimbabwe: 0.220DR Congo: 0.214Mali: 0.208Ethiopia: 0.195Somalia: 0.189Algeria: 0.183Rwanda: 0.182Madagascar: 0.177Angola: 0.173Mozambique: 0.170Republic of the Congo: 0.163Djibouti: 0.142Central African Republic: 0.131Guinea-Bissau: 0.129Comoros: 0.126Chad: 0.122Egypt: 0.120Cameroon: 0.097Guinea: 0.095Burundi: 0.066Eswatini: 0.064Burkina Faso: 0.048Equatorial Guinea: 0.045South Sudan: 0.038Eritrea: 0.025Sudan: 0.023Sudan 0.023Seychelles 0.703Americas27 comparedCosta Rica: 0.787Uruguay: 0.784Chile: 0.771Barbados: 0.712Brazil: 0.707Jamaica: 0.694Canada: 0.677Dominican Republic: 0.647Suriname: 0.620Trinidad and Tobago: 0.602Panama: 0.560United States: 0.481Guatemala: 0.471Colombia: 0.458Argentina: 0.410Peru: 0.377Ecuador: 0.366Honduras: 0.358Paraguay: 0.315Mexico: 0.246Guyana: 0.245Bolivia: 0.238Haiti: 0.195El Salvador: 0.125Cuba: 0.097Venezuela: 0.023Nicaragua: 0.017Nicaragua 0.017Costa Rica 0.787Asia48 comparedSouth Korea: 0.751Japan: 0.729Taiwan: 0.685Sri Lanka: 0.621Cyprus: 0.613Timor-Leste: 0.540Israel: 0.511Bhutan: 0.503Mongolia: 0.448Maldives: 0.416Nepal: 0.406Armenia: 0.376Malaysia: 0.364Indonesia: 0.363Singapore: 0.353Lebanon: 0.350Georgia: 0.320Iraq: 0.270Jordan: 0.268India: 0.259Philippines: 0.251Thailand: 0.193Kazakhstan: 0.185Pakistan: 0.182Vietnam: 0.181Kuwait: 0.176Syria: 0.166Bangladesh: 0.159Uzbekistan: 0.154Kyrgyzstan: 0.146Qatar: 0.120Iran: 0.094United Arab Emirates: 0.082Türkiye: 0.080Cambodia: 0.079Oman: 0.073Saudi Arabia: 0.072China: 0.064Bahrain: 0.060Laos: 0.060Hong Kong: 0.057Tajikistan: 0.048Yemen: 0.039Myanmar: 0.035Azerbaijan: 0.034Turkmenistan: 0.028Afghanistan: 0.012North Korea: 0.011North Korea 0.011South Korea 0.751Europe40 comparedDenmark: 0.867Norway: 0.863Switzerland: 0.852Luxembourg: 0.824Sweden: 0.817Ireland: 0.804France: 0.793Germany: 0.790Belgium: 0.775Finland: 0.762Estonia: 0.758Netherlands: 0.742Austria: 0.729Czechia: 0.703Iceland: 0.703Spain: 0.693Portugal: 0.691Latvia: 0.684United Kingdom: 0.665Lithuania: 0.662Poland: 0.653Malta: 0.642Slovenia: 0.612Greece: 0.610Italy: 0.610Montenegro: 0.521Croatia: 0.499Bulgaria: 0.474Moldova: 0.442Kosovo: 0.394North Macedonia: 0.372Slovakia: 0.362Bosnia and Herzegovina: 0.329Ukraine: 0.326Romania: 0.294Albania: 0.236Serbia: 0.208Hungary: 0.178Russia: 0.059Belarus: 0.032Belarus 0.032Denmark 0.867Oceania6 comparedAustralia: 0.771New Zealand: 0.644Vanuatu: 0.467Fiji: 0.406Solomon Islands: 0.395Papua New Guinea: 0.248Papua New Guinea 0.248Australia 0.771middle country 0.339

04All 176 ever measured

Every country

In order, highest value first. “=” marks a position shared with another country. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. The index scores the process of decision-making, not whether the decisions turn out well: a government can consult widely and still choose badly, or govern effectively without consulting anyone.

The raw table

Showing 25 of 176 countries

  1. 1 of 176DenmarkNorthern Europe0.867
  2. 2 of 176NorwayNorthern Europe0.863
  3. 3 of 176SwitzerlandWestern Europe0.852
  4. 4 of 176LuxembourgWestern Europe0.824
  5. 5 of 176SwedenNorthern Europe0.817
  6. 6 of 176IrelandNorthern Europe0.804
  7. 7 of 176FranceWestern Europe0.793
  8. 8 of 176GermanyWestern Europe0.790
  9. 9 of 176Costa RicaCentral America0.787
  10. 10 of 176UruguaySouth America0.784
  11. 11 of 176BelgiumWestern Europe0.775
  12. =12 of 176AustraliaAustralia and New Zealand0.771
  13. =12 of 176ChileSouth America0.771
  14. 14 of 176FinlandNorthern Europe0.762
  15. 15 of 176EstoniaNorthern Europe0.758
  16. 16 of 176South KoreaEastern Asia0.751
  17. 17 of 176NetherlandsWestern Europe0.742
  18. =18 of 176AustriaWestern Europe0.729
  19. =18 of 176JapanEastern Asia0.729
  20. 20 of 176BarbadosCaribbean0.712
  21. 21 of 176BrazilSouth America0.707
  22. =22 of 176CzechiaEastern Europe0.703
  23. =22 of 176IcelandNorthern Europe0.703
  24. =22 of 176SeychellesEastern Africa0.703
  25. 25 of 176JamaicaCaribbean0.694

Values for 2025. The change column compares 2025 with 2024 only; the sparkline covers the recent editions.

051990–2025 · 36 reference years

Over time

Each point is one year from 1990, all of them re-estimated together in V-Dem's v16 release. Because elections are built into the index it moves with the Electoral Democracy Index; a fall here that the electoral index does not share means the quality of debate is changing on its own.

0.10.20.30.40.50.60.719901995200020052010201520202025EuropeAmericasOceaniaAfricaAsia
  • the middle country
  • the middle half of countries
  • the middle of the 167 countries measured every time
  • each continent’s middle country
The same, year by year
YearCountriesMiddle countryMiddle halfMeasured every time
20251760.3390.169 – 0.6040.330
20241760.3440.167 – 0.5950.343
20231760.3530.174 – 0.6100.352
20221760.3430.174 – 0.6210.341
20211760.3540.172 – 0.6070.351
20201760.3670.194 – 0.6010.359
20191760.3760.212 – 0.5990.378
20181760.3810.217 – 0.6130.386
20171760.3750.209 – 0.6170.374
20161760.3840.195 – 0.6210.384
20151760.3780.197 – 0.6310.378
20141760.3810.193 – 0.6320.378
20131760.3720.193 – 0.6390.374
20121760.3970.221 – 0.6640.398
20111760.3970.204 – 0.6590.401
20101750.3860.210 – 0.6520.386
20091750.3810.198 – 0.6450.381
20081750.3790.199 – 0.6420.379
20071750.3640.192 – 0.6400.363
20061750.3770.189 – 0.6480.376
20051750.3690.192 – 0.6400.364
20041750.3600.187 – 0.6550.358
20031750.3490.185 – 0.6440.348
20021750.3470.193 – 0.6390.342
20011750.3280.188 – 0.6340.328
20001750.3250.184 – 0.6300.326
19991750.3220.162 – 0.6170.326
19981740.3140.164 – 0.6140.325
19971730.3110.158 – 0.6340.318
19961730.3100.159 – 0.6130.319
19951730.3130.149 – 0.6070.318
19941730.3030.139 – 0.6110.309
19931730.2990.140 – 0.5940.308
19921720.2760.123 – 0.5820.278
19911710.2440.108 – 0.5570.254
19901670.2250.094 – 0.5500.225

062024 → 2025

Who rose and fell

The biggest changes in value between the two newest editions — reference years recalculated in one report, not two separate publications. Places are shown second, because they also move when other countries do.

Improved most

before → after
  1. Mauritius0.411 → 0.663 · 75th → 32nd+0.252
  2. Sri Lanka0.451 → 0.621 · 64th → 39th+0.170
  3. South Korea0.592 → 0.751 · 45th → 16th+0.159
  4. Syria0.042 → 0.166 · 165th → 133rd+0.124
  5. Jamaica0.613 → 0.694 · 41st → 25th+0.081

Declined most

before → after
  1. United States0.745 → 0.481 · 16th → 58th−0.264
  2. Vanuatu0.610 → 0.467 · 42nd → 62nd−0.143
  3. Côte d’Ivoire0.343 → 0.241 · 90th → 109th−0.102
  4. Bolivia0.323 → 0.238 · 92nd → 110th−0.085
  5. Armenia0.453 → 0.376 · 63rd → 78th−0.077

176 countries were measured in both 2024 and 2025.

07Across every edition

Deliberative democracy in records

The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.

08The measure

About deliberative democracy

V-Dem's Deliberative Democracy Index asks how political decisions are reached: whether leaders justify their positions with public reasons about the common good, respect opposing arguments, and consult a wide range of people before acting — on top of genuine elections. It runs from 0 to 1, and a higher figure is more democratic.

What the number is: Deliberative democracy index (0–1).

What it does not measure

It judges how decisions are made, not whether the decisions themselves are good.

09Where it fits

Connections

Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.

All statistics

In the Country Index

Context, with no vote

This statistic is published in full under Democracy & Civil Liberties, but does not help decide any Country Index standing.

Democracy & Civil LibertiesWhich statistics vote, and why

Moves with

Where deliberative democracy is higher, these tend to be higher too.

Moves against

Where deliberative democracy is higher, these tend to be lower.

Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 187 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.

On the same subject

11Questions

Deliberative democracy: questions and answers

Which country has the highest deliberative democracy?

Denmark, at 0.867, among the 176 countries compared in 2025.

Which country has the lowest deliberative democracy?

North Korea, at 0.011, among the 176 countries compared in 2025.

How many countries does the Deliberative Democracy Index cover?

176 in 2025. The number measured varies from 167 to 176 between editions.

What is the world average deliberative democracy?

This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 176 compared in 2025, the figure was 0.339.

Is this V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg’s own ranking?

No. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg publishes the values but ranks nobody; the position on this page is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values, and equal values share a position.

How often is the Deliberative Democracy Index published?

This site holds 36 reference years, 1990–2025, all recalculated in V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg’s 2026 report on one method — not 36 separate publications.

Where does the data come from, and can I download it?

From V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, under CC BY-SA 4.0. From the V-Dem Institute's Country-Year Core dataset (v16), University of Gothenburg, published under CC BY-SA 4.0. V-Dem's data runs back to 1789; the series here starts in 1990 so that every row belongs to a present-day country. Every edition is on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, and downloads as a CSV file with every value unrounded.

12Method

Sources, method and citation

Source

Deliberative Democracy Index — V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg

From the V-Dem Institute's Country-Year Core dataset (v16), University of Gothenburg, published under CC BY-SA 4.0. V-Dem's data runs back to 1789; the series here starts in 1990 so that every row belongs to a present-day country.

Newest edition

Report year 2025Data year 2025

Cite the source as: Coppedge, M. et al. V-Dem Country-Year Dataset v16. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, University of Gothenburg.

Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0, checked 2026-09-26.

The full 2025 table, row for row

How this page reads the numbers

  • V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg ranks nobody on this measure. The position is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values; equal values share a position.
  • Which end is better follows the publisher’s own reading of the measure.
  • A country is named at an end only when it holds that value alone. Where several share it, the page says how many and names none first.
  • Values are stored exactly as published and trimmed only for display. “The middle country” is the median of the countries measured, not a world average.

The file itself, column by column — where it came from, what each column holds, and every edition as a CSV — is on its dataset page.

Photographs

The countries at the top of this statistic, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.

Cite this page

Nations Inquiry (2026). Deliberative democracy by country: Deliberative Democracy Index, data from V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg. https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/deliberative-democracy

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.