Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

Data for 2001

Demand for Family Planning Satisfied by Modern Methods, 2001

2001, as UN DESA Population Division’s 2024 release gives it · stored as published, never rewritten

Demand for Family Planning Satisfied by Modern Methods, 2001 covers 196 countries on 3 measures. China is highest, at 93.4; Somalia is lowest, at 3.1. The middle country reads 57.3. Against 2000, 192 values changed (176 up, 16 down), the same countries are covered.

Share

Demand for Family Planning Satisfied by Modern Methods · Data for 2001

HighestChina

93.4

LowestSomalia

3.1

Shaded by value in five groups of equal size, darkest at the better end. A higher value is the better result.

01Position · derived

The table

Every country and every column of Demand for Family Planning Satisfied by Modern Methods, 2001, as published. UN DESA Population Division ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. “=” marks a shared position.

Showing 25 of 196 countries · select a heading to sort

Demand for Family Planning Satisfied by Modern Methods, 2001: every country, as published by UN DESA Population Division.
derived
1ChinaCHNEastern Asia93.486.096.0Interpolation
2CanadaCANNorthern America90.882.694.6Projection
3ThailandTHASouth-eastern Asia90.587.492.9Interpolation
4FranceFRAWestern Europe90.077.593.5Interpolation
5SwitzerlandCHEWestern Europe87.877.892.7Projection
6NetherlandsNLDWestern Europe87.574.492.8Projection
7BelgiumBELWestern Europe87.173.592.5Projection
=8FinlandFINNorthern Europe86.575.791.0Projection
=8GermanyDEUWestern Europe86.572.092.3Projection
10NorwayNORNorthern Europe86.472.192.0Projection
11New ZealandNZLAustralia and New Zealand85.870.992.1Projection
12IrelandIRLNorthern Europe85.774.590.2Projection
13DenmarkDNKNorthern Europe85.570.593.3Projection
=14Hong KongHKGEastern Asia85.271.192.0Projection
=14United KingdomGBRNorthern Europe85.278.389.7Projection
16CubaCUBCaribbean84.675.890.4Projection
17AustraliaAUSAustralia and New Zealand84.569.490.4Projection
=18BrazilBRASouth America83.878.388.1Interpolation
=18UruguayURYSouth America83.872.890.4Projection
20SpainESPSouthern Europe82.977.087.2Projection
=21AustriaAUTWestern Europe82.867.889.7Projection
=21SwedenSWENorthern Europe82.870.189.9Projection
23TaiwanTWNEastern Asia82.064.589.5Projection
24Costa RicaCRICentral America81.672.887.3Interpolation
25South AfricaZAFSouthern Africa81.476.485.5Interpolation

02In 2001

At either end

The 5 countries at each end of the headline, then the highest and lowest on each other measure.

Highest

  1. 1China93.4
  2. 2Canada90.8
  3. 3Thailand90.5
  4. 4France90.0
  5. 5Switzerland87.8

Lowest

  1. 196Somalia3.1
  2. 195Chad10.8
  3. 194South Sudan11.2
  4. 193Rwanda14.9
  5. 192DR Congo15.0

A higher value is the better result. The middle country reads 57.3. “Shared” marks a value another country also holds.

Each measure’s ends

  • Lower bound (95% uncertainty interval)

    HighestThailand87.4

    LowestSomalia0.8

    Middle country: 44.6

  • Upper bound (95% uncertainty interval)

    HighestChina96.0

    LowestSomalia10.8

    Middle country: 71.2

032000 → 2001

Since 2000

What changed between 2000 and this one: who joined or left, and how far the headline moved.

  • +0 / −0countries joined / left
  • 192values changed, of 196 in both
  • 176 · 16rose · fell
  • 4unchanged

Rose most

Fell most

Both years come from the same release, so a difference here is a change in the data, not a revision of it. Every country’s full history is charted on the statistic page.

04Caveats

Read before you use

What this edition’s numbers are and are not, worked out from the file itself.

The site’s method
  • One year of the 2024 release

    Every year in this series comes from UN DESA Population Division’s 2024 release, recalculated on one method. It can differ from what was first published for 2001.

  • 174 distinct values among 196

    Values are stored exactly as published, to 1 decimal. 3 countries share 70.4. Countries sharing a value share a position too.

  • The position is ours

    UN DESA Population Division publishes values only. The order here sorts the published values, and the page says so wherever it prints one.

  • Which end is better

    A higher value is the better result.

  • Nothing missing

    Every one of the 196 countries has every column.

  • Some readings carry a flag

    UN DESA Population Division marks readings it considers estimates or provisional. The flags in this file: Interpolation, Projection.

05The files

Download and cite

The table as a file, digit for digit, what this site changed, and a citation for this edition.

Licence in full

What this site changed: Reshaped into one row per country: regional and income-group totals are left out, only the columns listed are kept, each row gets its ISO 3166 code, and some country names are brought to one spelling. No value is recalculated, rescaled or rounded.

Licence: CC BY 3.0 IGO. The version of CC BY written for intergovernmental organisations. Credit the publisher and say what you changed.

Cite this edition

UN DESA Population Division (2001). Demand for Family Planning Satisfied by Modern Methods, 2001 [data set], describing 2001. As held by Nations Inquiry, https://nationsinquiry.com/datasets/family-planning-demand-satisfied/2001

0634 held

Other years

07Questions

Demand for Family Planning Satisfied by Modern Methods, 2001: questions and answers

Which country has the highest demand for family planning satisfied in Demand for Family Planning Satisfied by Modern Methods, 2001?

China, at 93.4, of the 196 countries in the file.

What year does Demand for Family Planning Satisfied by Modern Methods, 2001 describe?

2001.

How many countries does Demand for Family Planning Satisfied by Modern Methods, 2001 cover?

196.

Where can I download Demand for Family Planning Satisfied by Modern Methods, 2001?

On this page, as a CSV file holding every value exactly as published, or from the publisher’s own site, linked below.

Is Demand for Family Planning Satisfied by Modern Methods, 2001 the newest?

No. The newest held here is Demand for Family Planning Satisfied by Modern Methods, 2023.

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.