Independent rankings built from public data — every figure traceable to the body that published it.
UNDP Human Development Report Office · Gender Inequality Index
How much human development is lost to inequality between women and men?
Of the 172 countries compared in 2023, Denmark had the lowest reading, 0.003, and Yemen had the highest reading, 0.838. In the middle country the figure was 0.352. Among the 80 countries measured in every edition since 1990, the middle one moved from 0.430 to 0.223.
Part ofHealth & WellbeingDevelopment & Human CapitalGender & Equality
Gender Inequality Index · 2023
Context statistic
Lowest of 172Denmark
0.003012023 · UNDP Human Development Report Office’s rank
The three countries at the lowest end of 172 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.
1Photo: User:Aconcagua · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale
2Photo: Ximonic , Simo Räsänen · CC BY-SA 3.0, greyscale
3Photo: User:Pieter Kuiper · Public domain, greyscale
02Every measured country
Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.
Darker is a lower value — the better end.
0.075
the middle country, of 38 measured · 49 members
Denmark0.003
Romania0.227
Lowest and highest reading in Europe.
0.291
the middle country, of 45 measured · 52 members
Singapore0.031
Yemen0.838
Lowest and highest reading in Asia.
0.358
the middle country, of 32 measured · 48 members
Canada0.052
Haiti0.618
Lowest and highest reading in Americas.
0.430
the middle country, of 8 measured · 21 members
Australia0.056
Papua New Guinea0.584
Lowest and highest reading in Oceania.
0.524
the middle country, of 49 measured · 55 members
Tunisia0.238
Nigeria0.677
Lowest and highest reading in Africa.
0.033
the middle country, of 7 measured · 9 members
Switzerland0.010
Germany0.057
Lowest and highest reading in Western Europe.
0.039
the middle country, of 10 measured · 13 members
Denmark0.003
Latvia0.117
Lowest and highest reading in Northern Europe.
0.105
the middle country, of 12 measured · 17 members
Slovenia0.042
Bosnia and Herzegovina0.157
Lowest and highest reading in Southern Europe.
0.169
the middle country, of 9 measured · 10 members
Belarus0.080
Romania0.227
Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Europe.
0.228
the middle country, of 17 measured · 19 members
United Arab Emirates0.040
Yemen0.838
Lowest and highest reading in Western Asia.
0.311
the middle country, of 10 measured · 24 members
Grenada0.226
Haiti0.618
Lowest and highest reading in Caribbean.
0.351
the middle country, of 11 measured · 11 members
Singapore0.031
Cambodia0.506
Lowest and highest reading in South-eastern Asia.
0.391
the middle country, of 12 measured · 12 members
Chile0.102
Venezuela0.512
Lowest and highest reading in South America.
0.391
the middle country, of 8 measured · 8 members
Costa Rica0.217
Guatemala0.480
Lowest and highest reading in Central America.
0.418
the middle country, of 6 measured · 6 members
Tunisia0.238
Sudan0.588
Lowest and highest reading in Northern Africa.
0.482
the middle country, of 9 measured · 9 members
Bhutan0.278
Afghanistan0.661
Lowest and highest reading in Southern Asia.
0.484
the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members
South Africa0.388
Lesotho0.534
Lowest and highest reading in Southern Africa.
0.504
the middle country, of 15 measured · 19 members
Mauritius0.352
Somalia0.675
Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Africa.
0.558
the middle country, of 7 measured · 9 members
São Tomé and Príncipe0.492
Chad0.670
Lowest and highest reading in Middle Africa.
0.583
the middle country, of 16 measured · 16 members
Cabo Verde0.298
Nigeria0.677
Lowest and highest reading in Western Africa.
2 of 2 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.
Australia0.056
New Zealand0.082
Lowest and highest reading in Australia and New Zealand.
4 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan.
Kazakhstan0.182
Kyrgyzstan0.340
Lowest and highest reading in Central Asia.
4 of 8 measured — too few for a middle: China, Japan, Mongolia, South Korea.
South Korea0.038
Mongolia0.284
Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Asia.
4 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu.
Fiji0.350
Papua New Guinea0.584
Lowest and highest reading in Melanesia.
2 of 4 measured — too few for a middle: Canada, United States.
Canada0.052
United States0.169
Lowest and highest reading in Northern America.
2 of 7 measured — too few for a middle: Samoa, Tonga.
Samoa0.416
Tonga0.444
Lowest and highest reading in Polynesia.
03The whole field at once
172 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 0.352; a quarter are above 0.491, and a quarter below 0.163. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.
04All 172 ever measured
In order, lowest value first. “=” marks a rank shared with another country. Read the direction carefully: a lower score is better, and rank 1 is the LEAST unequal country. Sorted the other way round, the table would name the world’s most equal country its most unequal.
Showing 25 of 172 countries
Values for 2023. The change column compares 2023 with 2022 only; the sparkline covers the recent editions.
051990–2023 · 34 reference years
Each point is one reference year from 1990. Coverage grows from 80 countries to 172 as the underlying health and labour data fills in.
| Year | Countries | Middle country | Middle half | Measured every time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 172 | 0.352 | 0.163 – 0.491 | 0.223 |
| 2022 | 172 | 0.356 | 0.154 – 0.493 | 0.222 |
| 2021 | 171 | 0.356 | 0.165 – 0.496 | 0.229 |
| 2020 | 169 | 0.362 | 0.162 – 0.497 | 0.237 |
| 2019 | 169 | 0.362 | 0.164 – 0.501 | 0.236 |
| 2018 | 167 | 0.365 | 0.176 – 0.508 | 0.242 |
| 2017 | 163 | 0.361 | 0.184 – 0.513 | 0.256 |
| 2016 | 162 | 0.370 | 0.193 – 0.512 | 0.274 |
| 2015 | 160 | 0.381 | 0.205 – 0.531 | 0.288 |
| 2014 | 157 | 0.384 | 0.202 – 0.533 | 0.292 |
| 2013 | 155 | 0.382 | 0.195 – 0.529 | 0.303 |
| 2012 | 154 | 0.385 | 0.212 – 0.537 | 0.313 |
| 2011 | 154 | 0.404 | 0.205 – 0.544 | 0.323 |
| 2010 | 154 | 0.408 | 0.209 – 0.545 | 0.325 |
| 2009 | 148 | 0.402 | 0.208 – 0.545 | 0.321 |
| 2008 | 148 | 0.402 | 0.220 – 0.545 | 0.331 |
| 2007 | 147 | 0.394 | 0.219 – 0.547 | 0.333 |
| 2006 | 146 | 0.408 | 0.228 – 0.562 | 0.342 |
| 2005 | 143 | 0.425 | 0.221 – 0.572 | 0.343 |
| 2004 | 138 | 0.432 | 0.212 – 0.574 | 0.349 |
| 2003 | 134 | 0.434 | 0.230 – 0.577 | 0.361 |
| 2002 | 130 | 0.437 | 0.233 – 0.581 | 0.359 |
| 2001 | 128 | 0.438 | 0.246 – 0.588 | 0.368 |
| 2000 | 125 | 0.439 | 0.265 – 0.581 | 0.374 |
| 1999 | 112 | 0.441 | 0.239 – 0.583 | 0.376 |
| 1998 | 107 | 0.440 | 0.244 – 0.578 | 0.397 |
| 1997 | 102 | 0.453 | 0.251 – 0.576 | 0.407 |
| 1996 | 101 | 0.457 | 0.253 – 0.579 | 0.413 |
| 1995 | 101 | 0.458 | 0.252 – 0.586 | 0.425 |
| 1994 | 87 | 0.435 | 0.250 – 0.568 | 0.424 |
| 1993 | 84 | 0.432 | 0.255 – 0.585 | 0.423 |
| 1992 | 80 | 0.428 | 0.254 – 0.569 | 0.428 |
| 1991 | 80 | 0.424 | 0.256 – 0.576 | 0.424 |
| 1990 | 80 | 0.430 | 0.257 – 0.576 | 0.430 |
062022 → 2023
The biggest changes in value between the two newest editions — reference years recalculated in one report, not two separate publications. Places are shown second, because they also move when other countries do.
172 countries were measured in both 2022 and 2023.
07Across every edition
The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.
Highest reading on record
0.840
GII (0 = full equality, 1 = maximum inequality)
Lowest reading on record
0.003
GII (0 = full equality, 1 = maximum inequality)
Biggest improvement between editions
−0.474
0.649 → 0.175
Biggest decline between editions
+0.335
0.431 → 0.766
Most improved since first measured
−0.724
0.764 → 0.040
At the top most often
20 of 34
editions, alone at the first-listed end
08The measure
UNDP’s Gender Inequality Index measures the human development a country loses to the gap between women and men, across reproductive health, empowerment and the labour market. It runs from 0, full equality, to 1, maximum inequality — so here, lower is better.
What the number is: GII (0 = full equality, 1 = maximum inequality).
What it does not measure
It covers reproductive health, representation and labour-market participation only; unpaid care work, violence against women and pay gaps are outside it.
09Where it fits
Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.
In the Country Index
Context, with no vote
This statistic is published in full under Health & Wellbeing and Development & Human Capital and Gender & Equality, but does not help decide any Country Index standing.
Health & WellbeingDevelopment & Human CapitalGender & EqualityWhich statistics vote, and why
Where Gender Inequality Index is higher, these tend to be higher too.
Where Gender Inequality Index is higher, these tend to be lower.
Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 185 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.
10Keep reading
11Questions
Denmark, at 0.003, among the 172 countries compared in 2023.
Yemen, at 0.838, among the 172 countries compared in 2023.
172 in 2023. The number measured varies from 80 to 172 between editions.
This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 172 compared in 2023, the figure was 0.352.
Yes. The rank shown is the one UNDP Human Development Report Office publishes.
This site holds 34 reference years, 1990–2023, all recalculated in UNDP Human Development Report Office’s 2025 report on one method — not 34 separate publications.
From UNDP Human Development Report Office, under CC BY 3.0 IGO. From the 2025 Human Development Report, which recalculates every year on one current method. UNDP states an official rank for 2023 only; the other 33 years are ordered here by score, after that ordering was verified against all 172 of UNDP’s own 2023 ranks. Every edition is on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, and downloads as a CSV file with every value unrounded.
12Method
Gender Inequality Index — UNDP Human Development Report Office
From the 2025 Human Development Report, which recalculates every year on one current method. UNDP states an official rank for 2023 only; the other 33 years are ordered here by score, after that ordering was verified against all 172 of UNDP’s own 2023 ranks.
Newest edition
Report year 2023Data year 2023
Cite the source as: UNDP. Human Development Report. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
Licence: CC BY 3.0 IGO, checked 2026-08-29.
The file itself, column by column — where it came from, what each column holds, and every edition as a CSV — is on its dataset page.
The countries at the top of this statistic, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.
Nations Inquiry (2026). Gender Inequality Index by country: Gender Inequality Index, data from UNDP Human Development Report Office. https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/gender-inequality