Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

FAO · Prevalence of Severe Food Insecurity

Severe food insecurity by country

What share of people ran out of food or went a day without eating?

Of the 133 countries compared in 2023, 7 countries shared the lowest reading, 0.0%, and South Sudan had the highest reading, 63.1%. In the middle country the figure was 4.7%. Among the 94 countries measured in every edition since 2015, the middle one moved from 3.2% to 3.9%.

Part ofHealth & WellbeingFood & Agriculture

Severe food insecurity · 2023

Key statistic · Health & Wellbeing

7 countries share the lowest value, 0.0% — no single country is named first.

012023 · position · derived

Who leads

The three countries at the lowest end of 133 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.

Lowest in 2023 · shared

7 countries share the lowest reading, 0.0%

No single country is named first: picking one from a shared value would be a choice the data does not make.

Highest in 2023

  1. South Sudan63.1%
  2. Malawi55.6%
  3. Haiti45.4%

Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.

Lowest on each continent

02Every measured country

Severe food insecurity on a map

Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.

All regions

Darker is a lower value — the better end.

  • 17.2–63.1%
  • 6.3–16.5%
  • 3.3–6.2%
  • 1.5–3.1%
  • 0.0–1.4%
  • No reading in 2023 (23 measured in an earlier edition)
  • Europe

    1.9%

    the middle country, of 39 measured · 49 members

    4 share 0.0%

    Albania8.4%

    Lowest and highest reading in Europe.

  • Asia

    3.4%

    the middle country, of 29 measured · 52 members

    3 share 0.0%

    Afghanistan31.0%

    Lowest and highest reading in Asia.

  • Oceania

    4.5%

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 21 members

    Australia3.7%

    Palau6.9%

    Lowest and highest reading in Oceania.

  • Americas

    5.0%

    the middle country, of 21 measured · 48 members

    United States1.0%

    Haiti45.4%

    Lowest and highest reading in Americas.

  • Africa

    17.8%

    the middle country, of 39 measured · 55 members

    Mali2.6%

    South Sudan63.1%

    Lowest and highest reading in Africa.

21 sub-regions, lowest middle country first
  • Western Asia

    1.3%

    the middle country, of 9 measured · 19 members

    2 share 0.0%

    Lebanon10.1%

    Lowest and highest reading in Western Asia.

  • Western Europe

    1.5%

    the middle country, of 7 measured · 9 members

    Luxembourg0.6%

    2 share 2.7%

    Lowest and highest reading in Western Europe.

  • Southern Europe

    1.6%

    the middle country, of 12 measured · 17 members

    Italy0.0%

    Albania8.4%

    Lowest and highest reading in Southern Europe.

  • Eastern Europe

    1.9%

    the middle country, of 10 measured · 10 members

    3 share 0.0%

    Romania7.0%

    Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Europe.

  • Northern Europe

    2.1%

    the middle country, of 10 measured · 13 members

    Estonia1.1%

    United Kingdom3.3%

    Lowest and highest reading in Northern Europe.

  • South-eastern Asia

    3.5%

    the middle country, of 9 measured · 11 members

    Indonesia0.0%

    Myanmar7.2%

    Lowest and highest reading in South-eastern Asia.

  • South America

    4.9%

    the middle country, of 8 measured · 12 members

    Uruguay2.7%

    Peru14.5%

    Lowest and highest reading in South America.

  • Western Africa

    9.7%

    the middle country, of 14 measured · 16 members

    Mali2.6%

    Liberia37.1%

    Lowest and highest reading in Western Africa.

  • Southern Asia

    10.1%

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 9 members

    Sri Lanka1.1%

    Afghanistan31.0%

    Lowest and highest reading in Southern Asia.

  • Caribbean

    12.4%

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 24 members

    Antigua and Barbuda3.4%

    Haiti45.4%

    Lowest and highest reading in Caribbean.

  • Central America

    15.4%

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 8 members

    Costa Rica2.7%

    Guatemala21.3%

    Lowest and highest reading in Central America.

  • Eastern Africa

    20.9%

    the middle country, of 13 measured · 19 members

    Mauritius12.2%

    South Sudan63.1%

    Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Africa.

  • Southern Africa

    24.7%

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members

    South Africa8.5%

    Namibia30.0%

    Lowest and highest reading in Southern Africa.

  • Australia and New Zealand

    2 of 2 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.

    Australia3.7%

    New Zealand4.3%

    Lowest and highest reading in Australia and New Zealand.

  • Central Asia

    3 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan.

    Kazakhstan0.6%

    Tajikistan5.6%

    Lowest and highest reading in Central Asia.

  • Eastern Asia

    3 of 8 measured — too few for a middle: Japan, Mongolia, South Korea.

    Mongolia0.7%

    2 share 1.1%

    Lowest and highest reading in Eastern Asia.

  • Micronesia

    2 of 7 measured — too few for a middle: Kiribati, Palau.

    Kiribati5.8%

    Palau6.9%

    Lowest and highest reading in Micronesia.

  • Middle Africa

    3 of 9 measured — too few for a middle: Cameroon, Chad, DR Congo.

    Cameroon24.7%

    DR Congo42.5%

    Lowest and highest reading in Middle Africa.

  • Northern Africa

    4 of 6 measured — too few for a middle: Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia.

    Algeria4.9%

    Libya17.2%

    Lowest and highest reading in Northern Africa.

  • Northern America

    2 of 4 measured — too few for a middle: Canada, United States.

    United States1.0%

    Canada1.9%

    Lowest and highest reading in Northern America.

  • Polynesia

    1 of 7 measured — too few for a middle: Samoa.

    Samoa4.5%

    Lowest and highest reading in Polynesia.

03The whole field at once

The spread

133 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 4.7%; a quarter are above 13.1%, and a quarter below 1.9%. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.

0%20%40%60%Africa39 comparedSouth Sudan: 63.1%Malawi: 55.6%DR Congo: 42.5%Liberia: 37.1%Sierra Leone: 33.7%Namibia: 30.0%Kenya: 28.1%Comoros: 27.4%Botswana: 26.1%Chad: 25.2%Zimbabwe: 25.1%Cameroon: 24.7%Lesotho: 24.7%Tanzania: 24.4%Nigeria: 24.3%Eswatini: 22.2%Gambia: 21.7%Burundi: 20.9%Ethiopia: 19.0%Madagascar: 17.8%Libya: 17.2%Zambia: 17.2%Djibouti: 16.5%Benin: 15.0%Uganda: 14.9%Mauritania: 13.1%Mauritius: 12.2%Egypt: 12.0%Togo: 9.9%Tunisia: 9.6%Ghana: 9.4%South Africa: 8.5%Côte d’Ivoire: 8.4%Niger: 7.6%Burkina Faso: 7.3%Cabo Verde: 6.1%Algeria: 4.9%Senegal: 4.0%Mali: 2.6%Mali 2.6%South Sudan 63.1%Americas21 comparedHaiti: 45.4%Jamaica: 27.8%Guatemala: 21.3%Dominican Republic: 17.9%El Salvador: 15.4%Honduras: 15.4%Peru: 14.5%Argentina: 12.3%Ecuador: 11.9%Trinidad and Tobago: 6.9%Colombia: 5.0%Grenada: 4.7%Guyana: 4.7%Chile: 3.6%Brazil: 3.4%Antigua and Barbuda: 3.4%Mexico: 2.9%Costa Rica: 2.7%Uruguay: 2.7%Canada: 1.9%United States: 1.0%United States 1.0%Haiti 45.4%Asia29 comparedAfghanistan: 31.0%Nepal: 12.8%Pakistan: 10.1%Lebanon: 10.1%Myanmar: 7.2%Palestine: 6.3%Georgia: 6.2%Iran: 5.9%Malaysia: 5.8%Tajikistan: 5.6%Laos: 5.6%Uzbekistan: 5.2%Cambodia: 3.6%Singapore: 3.5%Kuwait: 3.4%Philippines: 3.0%Vietnam: 2.2%Azerbaijan: 1.3%Japan: 1.1%South Korea: 1.1%Sri Lanka: 1.1%Israel: 0.9%United Arab Emirates: 0.9%Thailand: 0.8%Mongolia: 0.7%Kazakhstan: 0.6%Indonesia: 0.0%Armenia: 0.0%Cyprus: 0.0%Indonesia 0.0%Afghanistan 31.0%Europe39 comparedAlbania: 8.4%Romania: 7.0%Moldova: 5.4%Ukraine: 5.3%Hungary: 4.5%North Macedonia: 3.4%United Kingdom: 3.3%Portugal: 3.1%Finland: 2.9%France: 2.7%Netherlands: 2.7%Sweden: 2.5%Denmark: 2.4%Belgium: 2.4%Iceland: 2.1%Ireland: 2.1%Malta: 2.1%Bulgaria: 2.0%Bosnia and Herzegovina: 1.9%Latvia: 1.9%Czechia: 1.8%Montenegro: 1.6%Norway: 1.6%Austria: 1.5%Greece: 1.5%Serbia: 1.5%Slovakia: 1.4%Spain: 1.4%Germany: 1.2%Lithuania: 1.2%Estonia: 1.1%Switzerland: 1.1%Croatia: 1.0%Slovenia: 0.9%Luxembourg: 0.6%Poland: 0.0%Russia: 0.0%Belarus: 0.0%Italy: 0.0%Poland 0.0% · Albania 8.4%Oceania5 comparedPalau: 6.9%Kiribati: 5.8%Samoa: 4.5%New Zealand: 4.3%Australia: 3.7%Australia 3.7% · Palau 6.9%middle country 4.7%

04All 156 ever measured

Every country

In order, highest value first — position 1 is the highest value, the way FAO’s own tables read. “=” marks a position shared with another country. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. It asks people, where the prevalence of undernourishment calculates from national food supply. The two measure hunger from opposite ends and will not agree for any given country; both are here precisely because neither is the whole answer.

The raw table

Showing 25 of 156 countries

  1. 1 of 133South SudanEastern Africa63.1%
  2. 2 of 133MalawiEastern Africa55.6%
  3. 3 of 133HaitiCaribbean45.4%
  4. 4 of 133DR CongoMiddle Africa42.5%
  5. 5 of 133LiberiaWestern Africa37.1%
  6. 6 of 133Sierra LeoneWestern Africa33.7%
  7. 7 of 133AfghanistanSouthern Asia31.0%
  8. 8 of 133NamibiaSouthern Africa30.0%
  9. 9 of 133KenyaEastern Africa28.1%
  10. 10 of 133JamaicaCaribbean27.8%
  11. 11 of 133ComorosEastern Africa27.4%
  12. 12 of 133BotswanaSouthern Africa26.1%
  13. 13 of 133ChadMiddle Africa25.2%
  14. 14 of 133ZimbabweEastern Africa25.1%
  15. =15 of 133CameroonMiddle Africa24.7%
  16. =15 of 133LesothoSouthern Africa24.7%
  17. 17 of 133TanzaniaEastern Africa24.4%
  18. 18 of 133NigeriaWestern Africa24.3%
  19. 19 of 133EswatiniSouthern Africa22.2%
  20. 20 of 133GambiaWestern Africa21.7%
  21. 21 of 133GuatemalaCentral America21.3%
  22. 22 of 133BurundiEastern Africa20.9%
  23. 23 of 133EthiopiaEastern Africa19.0%
  24. 24 of 133Dominican RepublicCaribbean17.9%
  25. 25 of 133MadagascarEastern Africa17.8%

Values for 2023. The change column compares 2023 with 2022 only; the sparkline covers the recent editions.

052015–2023 · 9 reference years

Over time

Each point is one reference year from 2015.

5%10%15%20%201598 ctys201699 ctys2017114 ctys2018121 ctys2019135 ctys2020143 ctys2021145 ctys2022144 ctys2023133 ctysAfricaAmericasOceaniaAsiaEurope2015: middle country 3.3% of 982016: middle country 3.3% of 992017: middle country 3.6% of 1142018: middle country 3.9% of 1212019: middle country 4.5% of 1352020: middle country 5.6% of 1432021: middle country 5.7% of 1452022: middle country 5.4% of 1442023: middle country 4.7% of 133
  • the middle country
  • the middle half of countries
  • the middle of the 94 countries measured every time
  • each continent’s middle country
The same, year by year
YearCountriesMiddle countryMiddle halfMeasured every time
20231334.7%1.9% – 13.1%3.9%
20221445.4%2.0% – 13.2%4.3%
20211455.7%1.8% – 13.1%4.5%
20201435.6%1.6% – 13.3%4.1%
20191354.5%1.4% – 11.1%4.0%
20181213.9%1.1% – 10.0%3.6%
20171143.6%1.1% – 11.1%3.3%
2016993.3%1.3% – 12.1%3.3%
2015983.3%1.3% – 10.3%3.2%

062022 → 2023

Who rose and fell

The biggest changes in value between the two newest editions — reference years recalculated in one report, not two separate publications. Places are shown second, because they also move when other countries do.

Improved most

before → after
  1. Gambia25.5% → 21.7% · 15th → 20th−3.8
  2. Brazil6.6% → 3.4% · 64th → 77th−3.2
  3. Uganda17.7% → 14.9% · 28th → 32nd−2.8
  4. Libya19.9% → 17.2% · 23rd → 26th−2.7
  5. Namibia31.8% → 30.0% · 8th → 8th−1.8

Worsened most

before → after
  1. Eswatini18.6% → 22.2% · 27th → 19th+3.6
  2. Haiti42.4% → 45.4% · 4th → 3rd+3.0
  3. Madagascar14.9% → 17.8% · 33rd → 25th+2.9
  4. Malawi53.5% → 55.6% · 3rd → 2nd+2.1
  5. Mauritius10.2% → 12.2% · 45th → 37th+2.0

131 countries were measured in both 2022 and 2023. The field changed from 144 to 133 countries, so a place can move for reasons that have nothing to do with the country itself.

07Across every edition

Severe food insecurity in records

The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.

08The measure

About severe food insecurity

Severe food insecurity is the share of people who ran out of food, or went a whole day without eating, at some point in the year. The FAO gets it by asking them — the Food Insecurity Experience Scale — which makes it the human counterpart to its supply-based undernourishment estimate.

What the number is: Population in severe food insecurity (%).

What it does not measure

It records people's own reports of running out of food, not their nutrition; a child can be poorly nourished in a household that never ran out.

09Where it fits

Connections

Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.

All statistics

In the Country Index

A key statistic for Health & Wellbeing

“The share of people who went without food, established by asking them rather than by modelling the supply.”

Edition used
2023 (data 2023)
Countries
133
Licence
CC BY 4.0

Health & Wellbeing standingsHow the keys combine

Moves with

Where severe food insecurity is higher, these tend to be higher too.

Moves against

Where severe food insecurity is higher, these tend to be lower.

Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 167 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.

On the same subject

12Questions

Severe food insecurity: questions and answers

Which country has the lowest severe food insecurity?

7 countries share the lowest reading, 0.0%, among the 133 compared in 2023, so no single country is named.

Which country has the highest severe food insecurity?

South Sudan, at 63.1%, among the 133 countries compared in 2023.

How many countries does the Prevalence of Severe Food Insecurity cover?

133 in 2023, and 156 at least once across all editions. The number measured varies from 98 to 145 between editions.

What is the world average severe food insecurity?

This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 133 compared in 2023, the figure was 4.7%.

Is this Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)’s own ranking?

No. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) publishes the values but ranks nobody; the position on this page is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values, and equal values share a position.

How often is the Prevalence of Severe Food Insecurity published?

This site holds 9 reference years, 2015–2023, all recalculated in Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)’s 2026 report on one method — not 9 separate publications.

Where does the data come from, and can I download it?

From Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), under CC BY 4.0. From the FAO’s Food Insecurity Experience Scale via the World Bank’s indicator API (SN.ITK.SVFI.ZS). Coverage is partial and uneven — a country absent from an edition was not surveyed, which is not the same as having no hunger. Every edition is on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, and downloads as a CSV file with every value unrounded.

13Method

Sources, method and citation

Source

Prevalence of Severe Food Insecurity — Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)

From the FAO’s Food Insecurity Experience Scale via the World Bank’s indicator API (SN.ITK.SVFI.ZS). Coverage is partial and uneven — a country absent from an edition was not surveyed, which is not the same as having no hunger.

Newest edition

Report year 2023Data year 2023

Cite the source as: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT. Rome: FAO.

Licence: CC BY 4.0, checked 2026-09-06.

The full 2023 table, row for row

How this page reads the numbers

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) ranks nobody on this measure. The position is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values; equal values share a position.
  • Which end is better follows the publisher’s own reading of the measure.
  • A country is named at an end only when it holds that value alone. Where several share it, the page says how many and names none first.
  • Values are stored exactly as published and trimmed only for display. “The middle country” is the median of the countries measured, not a world average.

The file itself, column by column — where it came from, what each column holds, and every edition as a CSV — is on its dataset page.

Cite this page

Nations Inquiry (2026). Severe food insecurity by country: Prevalence of Severe Food Insecurity, data from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/severe-food-insecurity

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.