Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg · Government Social Media Censorship

Social media censorship by country

Does the government delete or filter political posts on social media?

Portugal placed first of the 176 countries compared in 2025, at 2.295, and North Korea last, at -3.721. In the middle country the figure was 0.505. Among the 175 countries measured in every edition since 2000, the middle one moved from 1.129 to 0.529.

Share

Part ofDemocracy & Civil LibertiesDigital & Technology

Social media censorship · 2025

Context statistic

Highest of 176Portugal

2.295

012025 · position · derived

Who leads

The three countries at the highest end of 176 compared, the three at the other end, and the first on each continent.

  1. 1

    Portugal

    Southern Europe

    2.295

    1st of 176

    Photo: Tsy1980 · CC BY-SA 4.0, greyscale

  2. 2

    Austria

    Western Europe

    2.180

    2nd of 176

    Photo: chensiyuan · CC BY-SA 4.0, greyscale

  3. 3

    Sweden

    Northern Europe

    2.142

    3rd of 176

    Photo: User:Pieter Kuiper · Public domain, greyscale

Lowest in 2025

  1. 176North Korea-3.721
  2. 175Turkmenistan-3.484
  3. 174China-3.007

Positions out of 176. Where a country sits says how it compares with the others measured, and nothing about why.

Highest on each continent

02Every measured country

Social media censorship on a map

Each country is shaded by its value, in five groups holding the same number of countries. Hover a country for its value, or select it to open its profile. Below the map, each continent’s middle country.

All regions

Darker is a higher value — the better end.

  • -3.721–-0.949
  • -0.918–-0.046
  • -0.045–0.874
  • 0.886–1.651
  • 1.652–2.295
  • No reading in 2025
  • Europe

    1.630

    the middle country, of 40 measured · 49 members

    Portugal2.295

    Russia-2.379

    Highest and lowest reading in Europe.

  • Americas

    1.418

    the middle country, of 27 measured · 48 members

    Guatemala2.137

    Nicaragua-2.259

    Highest and lowest reading in Americas.

  • Oceania

    1.373

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 21 members

    New Zealand1.751

    Fiji-0.022

    Highest and lowest reading in Oceania.

  • Africa

    -0.046

    the middle country, of 55 measured · 55 members

    Zambia2.115

    South Sudan-2.956

    Highest and lowest reading in Africa.

  • Asia

    -0.792

    the middle country, of 48 measured · 52 members

    Japan1.683

    North Korea-3.721

    Highest and lowest reading in Asia.

20 sub-regions, highest middle country first
  • Western Europe

    1.956

    the middle country, of 7 measured · 9 members

    Austria2.180

    France0.739

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Europe.

  • Northern Europe

    1.913

    the middle country, of 10 measured · 13 members

    Sweden2.142

    United Kingdom0.862

    Highest and lowest reading in Northern Europe.

  • Caribbean

    1.567

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 24 members

    Dominican Republic2.004

    Cuba-0.855

    Highest and lowest reading in Caribbean.

  • Southern Europe

    1.523

    the middle country, of 13 measured · 17 members

    Portugal2.295

    Serbia0.577

    Highest and lowest reading in Southern Europe.

  • Southern Africa

    1.455

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members

    Botswana1.926

    Eswatini-0.146

    Highest and lowest reading in Southern Africa.

  • Central America

    1.426

    the middle country, of 7 measured · 8 members

    Guatemala2.137

    Nicaragua-2.259

    Highest and lowest reading in Central America.

  • South America

    1.406

    the middle country, of 12 measured · 12 members

    Uruguay2.014

    Venezuela-0.817

    Highest and lowest reading in South America.

  • Eastern Europe

    0.630

    the middle country, of 10 measured · 10 members

    Slovakia2.097

    Russia-2.379

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Europe.

  • Eastern Asia

    0.452

    the middle country, of 7 measured · 8 members

    Japan1.683

    North Korea-3.721

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Asia.

  • Western Africa

    0.360

    the middle country, of 16 measured · 16 members

    Cabo Verde1.230

    Togo-1.282

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Africa.

  • Middle Africa

    -0.019

    the middle country, of 9 measured · 9 members

    São Tomé and Príncipe1.459

    Cameroon-1.521

    Highest and lowest reading in Middle Africa.

  • Eastern Africa

    -0.287

    the middle country, of 19 measured · 19 members

    Zambia2.115

    South Sudan-2.956

    Highest and lowest reading in Eastern Africa.

  • South-eastern Asia

    -0.336

    the middle country, of 10 measured · 11 members

    Timor-Leste1.056

    Myanmar-2.943

    Highest and lowest reading in South-eastern Asia.

  • Northern Africa

    -0.719

    the middle country, of 6 measured · 6 members

    Tunisia1.503

    Sudan-1.379

    Highest and lowest reading in Northern Africa.

  • Southern Asia

    -0.877

    the middle country, of 9 measured · 9 members

    Sri Lanka0.841

    Iran-2.240

    Highest and lowest reading in Southern Asia.

  • Western Asia

    -0.949

    the middle country, of 17 measured · 19 members

    Cyprus1.606

    United Arab Emirates-2.075

    Highest and lowest reading in Western Asia.

  • Central Asia

    -1.838

    the middle country, of 5 measured · 5 members

    Kyrgyzstan-0.685

    Turkmenistan-3.484

    Highest and lowest reading in Central Asia.

  • Australia and New Zealand

    2 of 2 measured — too few for a middle: Australia, New Zealand.

    New Zealand1.751

    Australia0.659

    Highest and lowest reading in Australia and New Zealand.

  • Melanesia

    4 of 5 measured — too few for a middle: Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu.

    Vanuatu1.650

    Fiji-0.022

    Highest and lowest reading in Melanesia.

  • Northern America

    2 of 4 measured — too few for a middle: Canada, United States.

    Canada1.418

    United States1.057

    Highest and lowest reading in Northern America.

03The whole field at once

The spread

176 countries, one dot each, on one scale — further right is a higher value. Half the countries are above 0.505; a quarter are above 1.525, and a quarter below -0.788. The bar in each row marks that continent’s middle country.

-3-2-1012Africa55 comparedZambia: 2.115Botswana: 1.926South Africa: 1.794Seychelles: 1.575Tunisia: 1.503São Tomé and Príncipe: 1.459Namibia: 1.455Cabo Verde: 1.230Gambia: 1.128Madagascar: 1.098Nigeria: 1.089Malawi: 1.016Sierra Leone: 0.946Ghana: 0.886Angola: 0.874Kenya: 0.777Liberia: 0.561Benin: 0.529Niger: 0.481Central African Republic: 0.466Comoros: 0.356Guinea-Bissau: 0.239Gabon: 0.139Lesotho: 0.091DR Congo: -0.019Somalia: -0.025Mauritius: -0.045Côte d’Ivoire: -0.046Libya: -0.093Eswatini: -0.146Somaliland: -0.255Zimbabwe: -0.287Guinea: -0.418Senegal: -0.469Mozambique: -0.559Morocco: -0.652Burkina Faso: -0.719Tanzania: -0.759Egypt: -0.785Burundi: -0.797Mauritania: -0.813Mali: -0.866Chad: -1.190Republic of the Congo: -1.210Algeria: -1.227Togo: -1.282Uganda: -1.323Sudan: -1.379Equatorial Guinea: -1.464Cameroon: -1.521Djibouti: -1.546Rwanda: -1.567Eritrea: -2.637Ethiopia: -2.891South Sudan: -2.956South Sudan -2.956Zambia 2.115Americas27 comparedGuatemala: 2.137Uruguay: 2.014Dominican Republic: 2.004Suriname: 1.892Paraguay: 1.877Chile: 1.850Bolivia: 1.842Jamaica: 1.818Trinidad and Tobago: 1.816Honduras: 1.749Panama: 1.581Brazil: 1.549Mexico: 1.426Canada: 1.418Barbados: 1.317Peru: 1.264Costa Rica: 1.245Argentina: 1.164United States: 1.057Haiti: 0.778El Salvador: 0.537Colombia: 0.474Guyana: 0.294Ecuador: 0.047Venezuela: -0.817Cuba: -0.855Nicaragua: -2.259Nicaragua -2.259Guatemala 2.137Asia48 comparedJapan: 1.683South Korea: 1.651Cyprus: 1.606Armenia: 1.330Timor-Leste: 1.056Mongolia: 0.900Sri Lanka: 0.841Israel: 0.639Taiwan: 0.452Philippines: 0.402Malaysia: 0.179Indonesia: 0.154Thailand: -0.062Iraq: -0.395Syria: -0.420Georgia: -0.471Pakistan: -0.544Maldives: -0.552Singapore: -0.609India: -0.651Cambodia: -0.682Kyrgyzstan: -0.685Bahrain: -0.775Laos: -0.777Lebanon: -0.807Bangladesh: -0.877Bhutan: -0.918Türkiye: -0.949Hong Kong: -0.950Nepal: -1.114Jordan: -1.135Kuwait: -1.137Kazakhstan: -1.183Saudi Arabia: -1.188Oman: -1.282Azerbaijan: -1.348Vietnam: -1.448Yemen: -1.535Qatar: -1.615Afghanistan: -1.823Uzbekistan: -1.838United Arab Emirates: -2.075Tajikistan: -2.231Iran: -2.240Myanmar: -2.943China: -3.007Turkmenistan: -3.484North Korea: -3.721North Korea -3.721Japan 1.683Europe40 comparedPortugal: 2.295Austria: 2.180Sweden: 2.142Ireland: 2.116Norway: 2.112Belgium: 2.108Latvia: 2.104Slovakia: 2.097Slovenia: 2.083Poland: 2.081Switzerland: 2.066Malta: 2.015Luxembourg: 1.956Iceland: 1.914Finland: 1.911Italy: 1.820Bulgaria: 1.804Czechia: 1.682Estonia: 1.663Lithuania: 1.652Croatia: 1.608Denmark: 1.588Spain: 1.531Montenegro: 1.523Albania: 1.350Kosovo: 1.104Netherlands: 0.931Bosnia and Herzegovina: 0.874United Kingdom: 0.862Greece: 0.838North Macedonia: 0.744Germany: 0.740France: 0.739Hungary: 0.677Romania: 0.582Serbia: 0.577Ukraine: -0.070Moldova: -0.130Belarus: -0.485Russia: -2.379Russia -2.379Portugal 2.295Oceania6 comparedNew Zealand: 1.751Vanuatu: 1.650Papua New Guinea: 1.393Solomon Islands: 1.353Australia: 0.659Fiji: -0.022Fiji -0.022 · New Zealand 1.751middle country 0.505

04All 176 ever measured

Every country

In order, highest value first. “=” marks a position shared with another country. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. ⚠ Higher is better here, though the name reads the other way. It covers political content on social platforms; shutting down Internet access altogether and censoring newspapers, radio and television are separate V-Dem measures, both on this site.

The raw table

Showing 25 of 176 countries

  1. 1 of 176PortugalSouthern Europe2.295
  2. 2 of 176AustriaWestern Europe2.180
  3. 3 of 176SwedenNorthern Europe2.142
  4. 4 of 176GuatemalaCentral America2.137
  5. 5 of 176IrelandNorthern Europe2.116
  6. 6 of 176ZambiaEastern Africa2.115
  7. 7 of 176NorwayNorthern Europe2.112
  8. 8 of 176BelgiumWestern Europe2.108
  9. 9 of 176LatviaNorthern Europe2.104
  10. 10 of 176SlovakiaEastern Europe2.097
  11. 11 of 176SloveniaSouthern Europe2.083
  12. 12 of 176PolandEastern Europe2.081
  13. 13 of 176SwitzerlandWestern Europe2.066
  14. 14 of 176MaltaSouthern Europe2.015
  15. 15 of 176UruguaySouth America2.014
  16. 16 of 176Dominican RepublicCaribbean2.004
  17. 17 of 176LuxembourgWestern Europe1.956
  18. 18 of 176BotswanaSouthern Africa1.926
  19. 19 of 176IcelandNorthern Europe1.914
  20. 20 of 176FinlandNorthern Europe1.911
  21. 21 of 176SurinameSouth America1.892
  22. 22 of 176ParaguaySouth America1.877
  23. 23 of 176ChileSouth America1.850
  24. 24 of 176BoliviaSouth America1.842
  25. 25 of 176ItalySouthern Europe1.820

Values for 2025. The change column compares 2025 with 2024 only; the sparkline covers the recent editions.

052000–2025 · 26 reference years

Over time

Each point is one year from 2000, when V-Dem's questions on digital society begin, all of them re-estimated together in the v16 release. The scale has no fixed ends, so read the movement and the gap to other countries rather than the number on its own.

-0.500.511.520002004200820122016202020242025EuropeAmericasOceaniaAfricaAsia
  • the middle country
  • the middle half of countries
  • the middle of the 175 countries measured every time
  • each continent’s middle country
The same, year by year
YearCountriesMiddle countryMiddle halfMeasured every time
20251760.505-0.788 – 1.5250.529
20241760.553-0.809 – 1.4200.561
20231760.655-0.802 – 1.4660.669
20221760.690-0.822 – 1.4520.702
20211760.709-0.857 – 1.4660.716
20201760.695-0.777 – 1.4860.726
20191760.704-0.768 – 1.4700.734
20181760.769-0.713 – 1.5770.787
20171760.769-0.777 – 1.5860.787
20161760.769-0.742 – 1.5770.787
20151760.852-0.742 – 1.6420.862
20141760.868-0.721 – 1.6420.874
20131760.900-0.603 – 1.6420.903
20121760.900-0.636 – 1.6420.903
20111760.979-0.584 – 1.6461.007
20101751.007-0.587 – 1.6501.007
20091751.084-0.568 – 1.7241.084
20081751.043-0.568 – 1.6781.043
20071751.129-0.568 – 1.7291.129
20061751.144-0.568 – 1.7591.144
20051751.129-0.568 – 1.7591.129
20041751.084-0.568 – 1.7021.084
20031751.129-0.568 – 1.7021.129
20021751.084-0.568 – 1.7361.084
20011751.129-0.542 – 1.7361.129
20001751.129-0.542 – 1.7361.129

062024 → 2025

Who rose and fell

The biggest changes in value between the two newest editions — reference years recalculated in one report, not two separate publications. Places are shown second, because they also move when other countries do.

Improved most

before → after
  1. Guinea-2.392 → -0.418 · 170th → 115th+1.974
  2. Ecuador-1.168 → 0.047 · 145th → 101st+1.215
  3. Syria-1.563 → -0.420 · 159th → 116th+1.143
  4. South Korea0.640 → 1.651 · 85th → 36th+1.011
  5. Montenegro0.544 → 1.523 · 89th → 45th+0.979

Declined most

before → after
  1. Georgia0.728 → -0.471 · 80th → 118th−1.199
  2. Ethiopia-1.923 → -2.891 · 165th → 171st−0.968
  3. Haiti1.624 → 0.778 · 32nd → 76th−0.846
  4. Mali-0.155 → -0.866 · 109th → 138th−0.711
  5. Australia1.301 → 0.659 · 51st → 82nd−0.642

176 countries were measured in both 2024 and 2025.

07Across every edition

Social media censorship in records

The extremes of the statistic. A record reached by more than one country names none of them.

08The measure

About social media censorship

V-Dem's measure of social media censorship asks how far a government deletes or filters political posts on social media in practice, from not at all to blocking the platforms outright. It is an expert-coded estimate on an open-ended scale centred near zero, and a higher figure means less censorship.

What the number is: Original latent estimate (≈ −4.5 to +2.4); higher = less censorship.

09Where it fits

Connections

Its part in the Country Index, the statistics whose values line up most closely with it across countries, and others on the same subject.

All statistics

In the Country Index

Context, with no vote

This statistic is published in full under Democracy & Civil Liberties and Digital & Technology, but does not help decide any Country Index standing.

Democracy & Civil LibertiesDigital & TechnologyWhich statistics vote, and why

Moves with

Where social media censorship is higher, these tend to be higher too.

Moves against

Where social media censorship is higher, these tend to be lower.

Rank correlation (ρ, from −1 to 1) across countries, on each statistic’s newest edition, out of 379 statistics sharing at least 80 countries with this one. Two statistics that move together do not cause each other.

On the same subject

11Questions

Social media censorship: questions and answers

Which country has the highest social media censorship?

Portugal, at 2.295, among the 176 countries compared in 2025.

Which country has the lowest social media censorship?

North Korea, at -3.721, among the 176 countries compared in 2025.

How many countries does the Government Social Media Censorship cover?

176 in 2025. The number measured varies from 175 to 176 between editions.

What is the world average social media censorship?

This site does not calculate a world average, which would depend on how countries are weighted. In the middle country of the 176 compared in 2025, the figure was 0.505.

Is this V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg’s own ranking?

No. V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg publishes the values but ranks nobody; the position on this page is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values, and equal values share a position.

How often is the Government Social Media Censorship published?

This site holds 26 reference years, 2000–2025, all recalculated in V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg’s 2026 report on one method — not 26 separate publications.

Where does the data come from, and can I download it?

From V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg, under CC BY-SA 4.0. From the V-Dem Institute's Country-Year Full+Others dataset (v16), University of Gothenburg — this indicator is a Digital Society Project question not in the smaller Core file — published under CC BY-SA 4.0. The series starts in 2000, when V-Dem's questions on digital society begin. Stored as the measurement model's original estimate, not V-Dem's 0–4 rescaling. Every edition is on this site’s Datasets pages as a full table, and downloads as a CSV file with every value unrounded.

12Method

Sources, method and citation

Source

Government Social Media Censorship — V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg

From the V-Dem Institute's Country-Year Full+Others dataset (v16), University of Gothenburg — this indicator is a Digital Society Project question not in the smaller Core file — published under CC BY-SA 4.0. The series starts in 2000, when V-Dem's questions on digital society begin. Stored as the measurement model's original estimate, not V-Dem's 0–4 rescaling.

Newest edition

Report year 2025Data year 2025

Cite the source as: Coppedge, M. et al. V-Dem Country-Year Dataset v16. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, University of Gothenburg.

Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0, checked 2026-09-29.

The full 2025 table, row for row

How this page reads the numbers

  • V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg ranks nobody on this measure. The position is derived by Nations Inquiry by ordering the published values; equal values share a position.
  • Which end is better follows the publisher’s own reading of the measure.
  • A country is named at an end only when it holds that value alone. Where several share it, the page says how many and names none first.
  • Values are stored exactly as published and trimmed only for display. “The middle country” is the median of the countries measured, not a world average.

The file itself, column by column — where it came from, what each column holds, and every edition as a CSV — is on its dataset page.

Photographs

The countries at the top of this statistic, from their profiles: Wikimedia Commons, shown in greyscale, each used under the licence named.

Cite this page

Nations Inquiry (2026). Social media censorship by country: Government Social Media Censorship, data from V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg. https://nationsinquiry.com/statistics/social-media-censorship

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.