Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

Data for 2003

Productive Capacities Index, 2003

2003, as UNCTAD’s 2025 release gives it · stored as published, never rewritten

Productive Capacities Index, 2003 covers 190 countries on 9 measures. Denmark is highest, at 68.13; DR Congo is lowest, at 11.95. The middle country reads 37.76. Against 2002, 188 values changed (153 up, 35 down), 2 countries joined.

Share

Productive Capacities Index · Data for 2003

HighestDenmark

68.13

LowestDR Congo

11.95

Shaded by value in five groups of equal size, darkest at the better end. A higher value is the better result.

01Position · derived

The table

Every country and every column of Productive Capacities Index, 2003, as published. UNCTAD ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. “=” marks a shared position.

Showing 25 of 190 countries · select a heading to sort

Productive Capacities Index, 2003: every country, as published by UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
derived
1DenmarkDNKNorthern Europe68.1370.1332.5273.4275.9862.7297.2374.9479.84—
2United StatesUSANorthern America67.6868.9828.0275.6378.6455.3585.6582.8197.59—
3AustraliaAUSAustralia and New Zealand66.8071.2639.2973.0269.1750.4891.5879.3576.47—
4NetherlandsNLDWestern Europe66.7663.4527.5476.3987.3356.8793.9877.4181.84—
5United KingdomGBRNorthern Europe65.5663.3630.9472.4175.5755.9188.9471.0390.05—
6IcelandISLNorthern Europe64.6079.2525.4067.2681.3265.6197.0385.8350.44—
7New ZealandNZLAustralia and New Zealand64.2662.6531.6765.9983.0848.5595.0387.3066.34—
8GermanyDEUWestern Europe63.9869.2321.0674.1577.4954.5087.6376.9291.18—
9NorwayNORNorthern Europe63.4268.4026.9965.9179.5659.1892.8185.3057.72—
10BelgiumBELWestern Europe62.3367.0920.2076.7181.8554.5886.7969.4181.46—
11CanadaCANNorthern America62.3066.5228.1969.7755.5055.9192.5181.5174.13—
12FinlandFINNorthern Europe62.0782.7618.4071.8078.7358.1699.7766.4866.37—
13SwedenSWENorthern Europe61.9780.3815.5066.3279.4663.8895.8070.4076.89—
14AustriaAUTWestern Europe61.6065.9119.5870.6477.1451.8992.2872.8884.56—
15IrelandIRLNorthern Europe61.4058.7329.8974.8286.0245.5488.2165.8467.65—
16FranceFRAWestern Europe60.8964.3421.1770.8376.3149.1881.8368.7492.81—
17SwitzerlandCHEWestern Europe60.7468.9011.8472.9179.3760.1793.9179.7887.11—
18SpainESPSouthern Europe59.5658.9224.6667.6770.7349.0082.4168.1582.76—
19LuxembourgLUXWestern Europe58.7761.3010.7090.7899.9154.6093.9370.4966.10—
20Hong KongHKGEastern Asia58.7552.8113.0876.4881.0760.0487.2187.6272.24Run-to-run variation exceeds +/- 1 index point
21South KoreaKOREastern Asia58.2963.3214.9375.9667.2059.3470.2084.7978.15—
22JapanJPNEastern Asia57.1774.229.0773.3866.8552.8380.8593.7186.37—
23MaltaMLTSouthern Europe57.1049.7928.2964.4285.1046.0783.3073.6951.74—
24ItalyITASouthern Europe57.0656.9021.7071.2067.0747.7972.1760.0392.10—
25PortugalPRTSouthern Europe56.4756.1125.5064.4560.2547.3383.5664.6672.73—

02In 2003

At either end

The 5 countries at each end of the headline, then the highest and lowest on each other measure.

Highest

  1. 1Denmark68.13
  2. 2United States67.68
  3. 3Australia66.80
  4. 4Netherlands66.76
  5. 5United Kingdom65.56

Lowest

  1. 190DR Congo11.95
  2. 189Burundi12.83
  3. 188Somalia12.89
  4. 187Niger12.90
  5. 186Central African Republic13.56

A higher value is the better result. The middle country reads 37.76. “Shared” marks a value another country also holds.

Each measure’s ends

032002 → 2003

Since 2002

What changed between 2002 and this one: who joined or left, and how far the headline moved.

  • +2 / −0countries joined / left
  • 188values changed, of 188 in both
  • 153 · 35rose · fell
  • 0unchanged

Rose most

Fell most

+ Indonesia+ Timor-Leste

Both years come from the same release, so a difference here is a change in the data, not a revision of it. Every country’s full history is charted on the statistic page.

04Caveats

Read before you use

What this edition’s numbers are and are not, worked out from the file itself.

The site’s method
  • One year of the 2025 release

    Every year in this series comes from UNCTAD’s 2025 release, recalculated on one method. It can differ from what was first published for 2003.

  • 187 distinct values among 190

    Values are stored exactly as published, to 2 decimals. 2 countries share 46.78. Countries sharing a value share a position too.

  • The position is ours

    UNCTAD publishes values only. The order here sorts the published values, and the page says so wherever it prints one.

  • Which end is better

    A higher value is the better result.

  • 181 empty cells

    An empty cell means the publisher gave no figure. It is never a zero.

05The files

Download and cite

The table as a file, digit for digit, what this site changed, and a citation for this edition.

Licence in full

What this site changed: Reshaped into one row per country: regional and income-group totals are left out, only the columns listed are kept, each row gets its ISO 3166 code, and some country names are brought to one spelling. No value is recalculated, rescaled or rounded.

Licence: CC BY 3.0 IGO. The version of CC BY written for intergovernmental organisations. Credit the publisher and say what you changed.

Cite this edition

UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2003). Productive Capacities Index, 2003 [data set], describing 2003. As held by Nations Inquiry, https://nationsinquiry.com/datasets/productive-capacities-index/2003

0623 held

Other years

07Questions

Productive Capacities Index, 2003: questions and answers

Which country has the highest Productive Capacities Index in Productive Capacities Index, 2003?

Denmark, at 68.13, of the 190 countries in the file.

What year does Productive Capacities Index, 2003 describe?

2003.

How many countries does Productive Capacities Index, 2003 cover?

190.

Where can I download Productive Capacities Index, 2003?

On this page, as a CSV file holding every value exactly as published, or from the publisher’s own site, linked below.

Is Productive Capacities Index, 2003 the newest?

No. The newest held here is Productive Capacities Index, 2022.

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.