Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

Data for 2008

Productive Capacities Index, 2008

2008, as UNCTAD’s 2025 release gives it · stored as published, never rewritten

Productive Capacities Index, 2008 covers 192 countries on 9 measures. Denmark is highest, at 71.56; Somalia is lowest, at 10.44. The middle country reads 42.63. Against 2007, 189 values changed (151 up, 38 down), 2 countries joined.

Share

Productive Capacities Index · Data for 2008

HighestDenmark

71.56

LowestSomalia

10.44

Shaded by value in five groups of equal size, darkest at the better end. A higher value is the better result.

01Position · derived

The table

Every country and every column of Productive Capacities Index, 2008, as published. UNCTAD ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. “=” marks a shared position.

Showing 25 of 192 countries · select a heading to sort

Productive Capacities Index, 2008: every country, as published by UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
derived
1DenmarkDNKNorthern Europe71.5676.6333.5871.6680.8072.4397.8979.2882.13—
2United StatesUSANorthern America69.8370.7328.5675.2479.9364.3486.0485.8598.00—
3AustraliaAUSAustralia and New Zealand69.7976.3540.5972.4770.8563.9292.5580.8173.99—
4NetherlandsNLDWestern Europe69.2264.9328.7976.4989.4672.2692.5574.6382.56—
5GermanyDEUWestern Europe68.1671.5923.3573.1180.8770.3889.0581.5392.30—
6United KingdomGBRNorthern Europe67.6465.0631.4972.6378.1568.9788.6470.8386.95—
7New ZealandNZLAustralia and New Zealand66.3465.7332.2566.2283.0262.9094.7582.1865.71—
8NorwayNORNorthern Europe65.9269.0027.2267.3781.2670.4193.2486.6860.96—
9IrelandIRLNorthern Europe65.6763.4928.9775.4487.2762.7791.6073.3267.76—
10AustriaAUTWestern Europe65.0571.0920.9170.9378.8264.4792.9874.7986.01—
11CanadaCANNorthern America65.0467.9228.8974.2557.7063.7392.5283.8677.04—
12SwedenSWENorthern Europe64.9276.4817.1866.2987.4271.5495.1775.8180.26—
13FinlandFINNorthern Europe64.4082.5518.1671.3582.3968.8096.7270.6071.49—
14FranceFRAWestern Europe64.2766.1620.9070.4379.0664.3084.6973.1194.91—
15IcelandISLNorthern Europe63.8578.4623.6470.0785.6073.9593.5666.9453.65—
16BelgiumBELWestern Europe63.7769.3318.3875.6886.1564.0183.9671.7885.29—
17SwitzerlandCHEWestern Europe62.8669.4912.3774.2180.7571.2394.6581.8385.78—
18LuxembourgLUXWestern Europe62.2961.9013.6483.7799.6572.3593.8475.9762.35—
19SpainESPSouthern Europe61.6062.4123.9868.2672.5659.8976.2971.3085.78—
20Hong KongHKGEastern Asia60.7357.2011.6980.3884.8171.1189.1793.1168.73Run-to-run variation exceeds +/- 1 index point
21CzechiaCZEEastern Europe60.4258.1832.2169.7566.2158.6676.2557.4179.91—
22IsraelISRWestern Asia60.0570.1722.8274.9668.6062.9870.2074.2262.60—
23South KoreaKOREastern Asia59.9773.0213.8675.8269.5565.4771.1686.2278.09—
24EstoniaESTNorthern Europe59.6357.2730.6362.4263.3462.5879.6962.2974.17—
25PortugalPRTSouthern Europe59.4664.7423.9064.2663.9857.7979.9071.2274.67—

02In 2008

At either end

The 5 countries at each end of the headline, then the highest and lowest on each other measure.

Highest

  1. 1Denmark71.56
  2. 2United States69.83
  3. 3Australia69.79
  4. 4Netherlands69.22
  5. 5Germany68.16

Lowest

  1. 192Somalia10.44
  2. 191Chad13.94
  3. 190DR Congo14.65
  4. 189Central African Republic14.95
  5. 188Niger15.21

A higher value is the better result. The middle country reads 42.63. “Shared” marks a value another country also holds.

Each measure’s ends

032007 → 2008

Since 2007

What changed between 2007 and this one: who joined or left, and how far the headline moved.

  • +2 / −0countries joined / left
  • 189values changed, of 190 in both
  • 151 · 38rose · fell
  • 1unchanged

Rose most

Fell most

+ Montenegro+ Serbia

Both years come from the same release, so a difference here is a change in the data, not a revision of it. Every country’s full history is charted on the statistic page.

04Caveats

Read before you use

What this edition’s numbers are and are not, worked out from the file itself.

The site’s method
  • One year of the 2025 release

    Every year in this series comes from UNCTAD’s 2025 release, recalculated on one method. It can differ from what was first published for 2008.

  • 188 distinct values among 192

    Values are stored exactly as published, to 2 decimals. 2 countries share 49.78. Countries sharing a value share a position too.

  • The position is ours

    UNCTAD publishes values only. The order here sorts the published values, and the page says so wherever it prints one.

  • Which end is better

    A higher value is the better result.

  • 190 empty cells

    An empty cell means the publisher gave no figure. It is never a zero.

05The files

Download and cite

The table as a file, digit for digit, what this site changed, and a citation for this edition.

Licence in full

What this site changed: Reshaped into one row per country: regional and income-group totals are left out, only the columns listed are kept, each row gets its ISO 3166 code, and some country names are brought to one spelling. No value is recalculated, rescaled or rounded.

Licence: CC BY 3.0 IGO. The version of CC BY written for intergovernmental organisations. Credit the publisher and say what you changed.

Cite this edition

UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2008). Productive Capacities Index, 2008 [data set], describing 2008. As held by Nations Inquiry, https://nationsinquiry.com/datasets/productive-capacities-index/2008

0623 held

Other years

07Questions

Productive Capacities Index, 2008: questions and answers

Which country has the highest Productive Capacities Index in Productive Capacities Index, 2008?

Denmark, at 71.56, of the 192 countries in the file.

What year does Productive Capacities Index, 2008 describe?

2008.

How many countries does Productive Capacities Index, 2008 cover?

192.

Where can I download Productive Capacities Index, 2008?

On this page, as a CSV file holding every value exactly as published, or from the publisher’s own site, linked below.

Is Productive Capacities Index, 2008 the newest?

No. The newest held here is Productive Capacities Index, 2022.

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.