Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

Data for 2010

Productive Capacities Index, 2010

2010, as UNCTAD’s 2025 release gives it · stored as published, never rewritten

Productive Capacities Index, 2010 covers 192 countries on 9 measures. Australia is highest, at 70.09; Somalia is lowest, at 11.25. The middle country reads 43.62. Against 2009, 192 values changed (122 up, 70 down), the same countries are covered.

Share

Productive Capacities Index · Data for 2010

HighestAustralia

70.09

LowestSomalia

11.25

Shaded by value in five groups of equal size, darkest at the better end. A higher value is the better result.

01Position · derived

The table

Every country and every column of Productive Capacities Index, 2010, as published. UNCTAD ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. “=” marks a shared position.

Showing 25 of 192 countries · select a heading to sort

Productive Capacities Index, 2010: every country, as published by UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
derived
1AustraliaAUSAustralia and New Zealand70.0977.4840.4472.4072.7864.7192.1381.8072.29—
2DenmarkDNKNorthern Europe70.0178.9431.2770.0279.7571.3196.9578.4477.19—
3NetherlandsNLDWestern Europe69.5766.5227.5176.7191.4371.6793.0580.4279.69—
4United StatesUSANorthern America69.1271.3426.5774.5579.3864.5684.2989.9194.91—
5United KingdomGBRNorthern Europe67.6066.4229.4772.0276.7069.9288.0476.5885.56—
6GermanyDEUWestern Europe67.5773.5422.0874.0879.4969.7088.4381.0890.93—
7New ZealandNZLAustralia and New Zealand66.6566.9131.7065.8580.2765.4395.8887.0363.61—
8SwedenSWENorthern Europe65.4275.0118.5666.3590.2270.5095.3676.1778.60—
9CanadaCANNorthern America64.9268.5127.1473.1158.1965.0592.4186.1277.09—
10FinlandFINNorthern Europe64.7483.9318.1972.6283.0968.5698.0170.5970.62—
11IrelandIRLNorthern Europe64.6866.0829.0874.3286.8762.4988.9673.3160.57—
12NorwayNORNorthern Europe64.5770.5626.0666.6580.1270.1694.7277.8459.47—
13AustriaAUTWestern Europe64.5372.9919.8371.0479.8066.5290.8172.1884.09—
14BelgiumBELWestern Europe64.0871.1218.4875.2185.8464.4486.1072.2283.63—
15FranceFRAWestern Europe63.9867.7420.4969.5276.6865.3684.8374.6991.67—
16SwitzerlandCHEWestern Europe63.4471.8612.5174.1181.7372.6194.2483.3284.53—
17LuxembourgLUXWestern Europe62.4463.6213.2484.0297.8573.7694.7778.0261.17—
18IcelandISLNorthern Europe61.6479.5822.7368.6085.2773.4988.3869.5743.61—
19Hong KongHKGEastern Asia61.3458.0811.6381.5885.2073.7688.2594.5869.31Run-to-run variation exceeds +/- 1 index point
20South KoreaKOREastern Asia60.6776.6013.0076.2271.5966.4473.0988.2278.89—
21SpainESPSouthern Europe60.3864.2222.3966.3470.8159.8575.8571.0681.04—
22CzechiaCZEEastern Europe60.1260.3030.4769.3765.1458.7176.3659.5876.97—
23PortugalPRTSouthern Europe59.5166.3325.6464.5362.3257.6876.8571.2572.84—
24EstoniaESTNorthern Europe59.4660.5130.7162.4765.6663.6479.8662.6364.34—
25MaltaMLTSouthern Europe59.4555.4226.3569.2186.0666.2982.9362.7652.02—

02In 2010

At either end

The 5 countries at each end of the headline, then the highest and lowest on each other measure.

Highest

  1. 1Australia70.09
  2. 2Denmark70.01
  3. 3Netherlands69.57
  4. 4United States69.12
  5. 5United Kingdom67.60

Lowest

  1. 192Somalia11.25
  2. 191Chad14.38
  3. 190DR Congo14.42
  4. 189Myanmar15.07
  5. 188Central African Republic15.70

A higher value is the better result. The middle country reads 43.62. “Shared” marks a value another country also holds.

Each measure’s ends

032009 → 2010

Since 2009

What changed between 2009 and this one: who joined or left, and how far the headline moved.

  • +0 / −0countries joined / left
  • 192values changed, of 192 in both
  • 122 · 70rose · fell
  • 0unchanged

Rose most

Fell most

Both years come from the same release, so a difference here is a change in the data, not a revision of it. Every country’s full history is charted on the statistic page.

04Caveats

Read before you use

What this edition’s numbers are and are not, worked out from the file itself.

The site’s method
  • One year of the 2025 release

    Every year in this series comes from UNCTAD’s 2025 release, recalculated on one method. It can differ from what was first published for 2010.

  • 189 distinct values among 192

    Values are stored exactly as published, to 2 decimals. 2 countries share 47.36. Countries sharing a value share a position too.

  • The position is ours

    UNCTAD publishes values only. The order here sorts the published values, and the page says so wherever it prints one.

  • Which end is better

    A higher value is the better result.

  • 190 empty cells

    An empty cell means the publisher gave no figure. It is never a zero.

05The files

Download and cite

The table as a file, digit for digit, what this site changed, and a citation for this edition.

Licence in full

What this site changed: Reshaped into one row per country: regional and income-group totals are left out, only the columns listed are kept, each row gets its ISO 3166 code, and some country names are brought to one spelling. No value is recalculated, rescaled or rounded.

Licence: CC BY 3.0 IGO. The version of CC BY written for intergovernmental organisations. Credit the publisher and say what you changed.

Cite this edition

UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2010). Productive Capacities Index, 2010 [data set], describing 2010. As held by Nations Inquiry, https://nationsinquiry.com/datasets/productive-capacities-index/2010

0623 held

Other years

07Questions

Productive Capacities Index, 2010: questions and answers

Which country has the highest Productive Capacities Index in Productive Capacities Index, 2010?

Australia, at 70.09, of the 192 countries in the file.

What year does Productive Capacities Index, 2010 describe?

2010.

How many countries does Productive Capacities Index, 2010 cover?

192.

Where can I download Productive Capacities Index, 2010?

On this page, as a CSV file holding every value exactly as published, or from the publisher’s own site, linked below.

Is Productive Capacities Index, 2010 the newest?

No. The newest held here is Productive Capacities Index, 2022.

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.