Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

Data for 2018

Productive Capacities Index, 2018

2018, as UNCTAD’s 2025 release gives it · stored as published, never rewritten

Productive Capacities Index, 2018 covers 195 countries on 9 measures. Denmark is highest, at 71.20; Somalia is lowest, at 16.13. The middle country reads 46.22. Against 2017, 194 values changed (135 up, 59 down), the same countries are covered.

Share

Productive Capacities Index · Data for 2018

HighestDenmark

71.20

LowestSomalia

16.13

Shaded by value in five groups of equal size, darkest at the better end. A higher value is the better result.

01Position · derived

The table

Every country and every column of Productive Capacities Index, 2018, as published. UNCTAD ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. “=” marks a shared position.

Showing 25 of 195 countries · select a heading to sort

Productive Capacities Index, 2018: every country, as published by UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
derived
1DenmarkDNKNorthern Europe71.2084.1228.9970.3483.7479.3093.3377.2780.37—
2NetherlandsNLDWestern Europe70.9675.8524.7076.6593.4878.6193.0979.4582.40—
3AustraliaAUSAustralia and New Zealand70.7975.7539.9274.1171.5573.1390.9585.7868.90—
4United StatesUSANorthern America70.1674.7825.3676.1276.8073.2583.7090.7695.14—
5United KingdomGBRNorthern Europe69.3573.7728.6570.7978.2577.0986.4779.6586.12—
6New ZealandNZLAustralia and New Zealand68.9570.8329.3866.9783.5071.9596.3297.3465.04—
7GermanyDEUWestern Europe68.3778.0119.4973.9979.9579.0689.2983.0090.61—
8CanadaCANNorthern America67.4569.8526.9072.3573.1374.3291.2684.5975.13—
9SwedenSWENorthern Europe66.7186.5618.1666.4888.9472.4593.4077.8980.04—
10BelgiumBELWestern Europe66.3579.5319.4073.5787.9072.0982.3075.9183.55—
11NorwayNORNorthern Europe66.1977.7325.6069.3279.4671.7195.3878.8462.33—
12IrelandIRLNorthern Europe65.2368.5325.4781.3287.6072.6787.0060.3269.15—
13FinlandFINNorthern Europe64.7882.7118.6070.1884.0968.0095.7472.9971.83—
14AustriaAUTWestern Europe64.7677.9217.2771.3378.1972.9488.7775.0884.75—
15FranceFRAWestern Europe64.6171.2419.4369.0274.6876.1680.3776.8590.47—
16United Arab EmiratesAREWestern Asia64.2149.8334.0780.3483.3380.5670.5472.0262.11—
17Hong KongHKGEastern Asia64.1162.4711.4285.8188.0390.6489.1098.3066.75Run-to-run variation exceeds +/- 1 index point
18IcelandISLNorthern Europe63.9575.0522.8470.5390.3780.3890.1370.2250.31—
19LuxembourgLUXWestern Europe63.9361.6915.9774.2899.6180.6394.3778.0864.44—
20SwitzerlandCHEWestern Europe63.8878.8810.9776.0182.4079.7895.8283.8579.81—
21QatarQATWestern Asia63.6942.2946.6181.4985.2564.5063.7469.0169.66—
22South KoreaKOREastern Asia63.6389.7511.7277.6777.0776.4576.3493.6978.01—
23IsraelISRWestern Asia62.2875.6124.8675.9367.8870.8670.8770.7565.78—
24CzechiaCZEEastern Europe62.0865.3327.2870.1367.9968.4076.7265.4175.63—
25PortugalPRTSouthern Europe61.2267.9522.5864.4766.0272.3579.1873.4971.76—

02In 2018

At either end

The 5 countries at each end of the headline, then the highest and lowest on each other measure.

Highest

  1. 1Denmark71.20
  2. 2Netherlands70.96
  3. 3Australia70.79
  4. 4United States70.16
  5. 5United Kingdom69.35

Lowest

  1. 195Somalia16.13
  2. 194South Sudan18.14
  3. 193Chad18.18
  4. 192Niger18.58
  5. 191DR Congo19.32

A higher value is the better result. The middle country reads 46.22. “Shared” marks a value another country also holds.

Each measure’s ends

032017 → 2018

Since 2017

What changed between 2017 and this one: who joined or left, and how far the headline moved.

  • +0 / −0countries joined / left
  • 194values changed, of 195 in both
  • 135 · 59rose · fell
  • 1unchanged

Rose most

Fell most

Both years come from the same release, so a difference here is a change in the data, not a revision of it. Every country’s full history is charted on the statistic page.

04Caveats

Read before you use

What this edition’s numbers are and are not, worked out from the file itself.

The site’s method
  • One year of the 2025 release

    Every year in this series comes from UNCTAD’s 2025 release, recalculated on one method. It can differ from what was first published for 2018.

  • 194 distinct values among 195

    Values are stored exactly as published, to 2 decimals. 2 countries share 43.89. Countries sharing a value share a position too.

  • The position is ours

    UNCTAD publishes values only. The order here sorts the published values, and the page says so wherever it prints one.

  • Which end is better

    A higher value is the better result.

  • 191 empty cells

    An empty cell means the publisher gave no figure. It is never a zero.

05The files

Download and cite

The table as a file, digit for digit, what this site changed, and a citation for this edition.

Licence in full

What this site changed: Reshaped into one row per country: regional and income-group totals are left out, only the columns listed are kept, each row gets its ISO 3166 code, and some country names are brought to one spelling. No value is recalculated, rescaled or rounded.

Licence: CC BY 3.0 IGO. The version of CC BY written for intergovernmental organisations. Credit the publisher and say what you changed.

Cite this edition

UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2018). Productive Capacities Index, 2018 [data set], describing 2018. As held by Nations Inquiry, https://nationsinquiry.com/datasets/productive-capacities-index/2018

0623 held

Other years

07Questions

Productive Capacities Index, 2018: questions and answers

Which country has the highest Productive Capacities Index in Productive Capacities Index, 2018?

Denmark, at 71.20, of the 195 countries in the file.

What year does Productive Capacities Index, 2018 describe?

2018.

How many countries does Productive Capacities Index, 2018 cover?

195.

Where can I download Productive Capacities Index, 2018?

On this page, as a CSV file holding every value exactly as published, or from the publisher’s own site, linked below.

Is Productive Capacities Index, 2018 the newest?

No. The newest held here is Productive Capacities Index, 2022.

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.