Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

Data for 2017

Productive Capacities Index, 2017

2017, as UNCTAD’s 2025 release gives it · stored as published, never rewritten

Productive Capacities Index, 2017 covers 195 countries on 9 measures. Denmark is highest, at 70.89; Somalia is lowest, at 15.64. The middle country reads 46.17. Against 2016, 194 values changed (152 up, 42 down), the same countries are covered.

Share

Productive Capacities Index · Data for 2017

HighestDenmark

70.89

LowestSomalia

15.64

Shaded by value in five groups of equal size, darkest at the better end. A higher value is the better result.

01Position · derived

The table

Every country and every column of Productive Capacities Index, 2017, as published. UNCTAD ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. “=” marks a shared position.

Showing 25 of 195 countries · select a heading to sort

Productive Capacities Index, 2017: every country, as published by UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
derived
1DenmarkDNKNorthern Europe70.8984.1629.0271.5782.3577.3592.8176.8980.30—
2NetherlandsNLDWestern Europe70.8775.5623.9676.5693.7278.6892.9280.5183.25—
=3AustraliaAUSAustralia and New Zealand69.7177.5040.2973.9663.0371.3090.2885.5169.62—
=3United StatesUSANorthern America69.7173.6424.6675.2476.6671.7683.9992.7095.30—
5United KingdomGBRNorthern Europe68.9372.1327.8370.9877.7276.6687.6679.1786.54—
6New ZealandNZLAustralia and New Zealand68.4369.8129.6167.0083.4974.0697.4788.8964.79—
7GermanyDEUWestern Europe67.9677.2519.2174.0480.1178.0989.2082.5189.99—
8CanadaCANNorthern America67.3068.9726.2271.8873.2673.2193.4185.3575.74—
9SwedenSWENorthern Europe66.8886.2718.1067.2288.0073.8693.5077.5980.83—
10NorwayNORNorthern Europe66.2777.6225.0069.2579.2871.7396.6979.0763.65—
11IrelandIRLNorthern Europe65.9369.3125.9079.8987.0671.2286.1863.0873.90—
12BelgiumBELWestern Europe65.5678.1417.9174.3088.7871.0782.2075.4283.93—
13AustriaAUTWestern Europe64.5376.9617.0471.0380.1571.6688.4174.3385.53—
14FranceFRAWestern Europe64.5270.7919.6168.9875.2675.1780.5676.7189.74—
15FinlandFINNorthern Europe64.1981.9717.9570.3782.9467.3596.1372.7671.23—
16SwitzerlandCHEWestern Europe63.8378.2011.2574.6281.8778.9995.7584.1780.59—
=17Hong KongHKGEastern Asia63.6361.1311.4185.7288.3987.5288.4898.4466.70Run-to-run variation exceeds +/- 1 index point
=17QatarQATWestern Asia63.6342.8746.3481.3085.5263.1863.5169.0570.26—
19United Arab EmiratesAREWestern Asia63.5547.5333.7380.5183.1877.6670.4870.9163.85—
20IcelandISLNorthern Europe63.5076.2821.3769.8990.3580.6789.4370.8850.25—
21South KoreaKOREastern Asia63.3487.1911.9777.3976.5574.9474.1394.2380.01—
22LuxembourgLUXWestern Europe62.0962.2210.9274.2499.0780.9392.8689.1665.97—
23IsraelISRWestern Asia62.0475.4124.3775.9967.8069.9972.2571.5064.14—
24CzechiaCZEEastern Europe61.4464.9427.1769.8165.6067.3677.4564.2974.91—
25SingaporeSGPSouth-eastern Asia61.0974.196.2390.4698.5974.8892.6895.2171.23—

02In 2017

At either end

The 5 countries at each end of the headline, then the highest and lowest on each other measure.

Highest

  1. 1Denmark70.89
  2. 2Netherlands70.87
  3. 3Australiashared69.71
  4. 3United Statesshared69.71
  5. 5United Kingdom68.93

Lowest

  1. 195Somalia15.64
  2. 194Chad18.12
  3. 193Central African Republic18.67
  4. 192South Sudan18.84
  5. 191Niger19.07

A higher value is the better result. The middle country reads 46.17. “Shared” marks a value another country also holds.

Each measure’s ends

032016 → 2017

Since 2016

What changed between 2016 and this one: who joined or left, and how far the headline moved.

  • +0 / −0countries joined / left
  • 194values changed, of 195 in both
  • 152 · 42rose · fell
  • 1unchanged

Rose most

Fell most

Both years come from the same release, so a difference here is a change in the data, not a revision of it. Every country’s full history is charted on the statistic page.

04Caveats

Read before you use

What this edition’s numbers are and are not, worked out from the file itself.

The site’s method
  • One year of the 2025 release

    Every year in this series comes from UNCTAD’s 2025 release, recalculated on one method. It can differ from what was first published for 2017.

  • 191 distinct values among 195

    Values are stored exactly as published, to 2 decimals. 2 countries share 69.71. Countries sharing a value share a position too.

  • The position is ours

    UNCTAD publishes values only. The order here sorts the published values, and the page says so wherever it prints one.

  • Which end is better

    A higher value is the better result.

  • 192 empty cells

    An empty cell means the publisher gave no figure. It is never a zero.

05The files

Download and cite

The table as a file, digit for digit, what this site changed, and a citation for this edition.

Licence in full

What this site changed: Reshaped into one row per country: regional and income-group totals are left out, only the columns listed are kept, each row gets its ISO 3166 code, and some country names are brought to one spelling. No value is recalculated, rescaled or rounded.

Licence: CC BY 3.0 IGO. The version of CC BY written for intergovernmental organisations. Credit the publisher and say what you changed.

Cite this edition

UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2017). Productive Capacities Index, 2017 [data set], describing 2017. As held by Nations Inquiry, https://nationsinquiry.com/datasets/productive-capacities-index/2017

0623 held

Other years

07Questions

Productive Capacities Index, 2017: questions and answers

Which country has the highest Productive Capacities Index in Productive Capacities Index, 2017?

Denmark, at 70.89, of the 195 countries in the file.

What year does Productive Capacities Index, 2017 describe?

2017.

How many countries does Productive Capacities Index, 2017 cover?

195.

Where can I download Productive Capacities Index, 2017?

On this page, as a CSV file holding every value exactly as published, or from the publisher’s own site, linked below.

Is Productive Capacities Index, 2017 the newest?

No. The newest held here is Productive Capacities Index, 2022.

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.