Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

Data for 2009

Productive Capacities Index, 2009

2009, as UNCTAD’s 2025 release gives it · stored as published, never rewritten

Productive Capacities Index, 2009 covers 192 countries on 9 measures. Denmark is highest, at 70.77; Somalia is lowest, at 11.18. The middle country reads 43.10. Against 2008, 191 values changed (119 up, 72 down), the same countries are covered.

Share

Productive Capacities Index · Data for 2009

HighestDenmark

70.77

LowestSomalia

11.18

Shaded by value in five groups of equal size, darkest at the better end. A higher value is the better result.

01Position · derived

The table

Every country and every column of Productive Capacities Index, 2009, as published. UNCTAD ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. “=” marks a shared position.

Showing 25 of 192 countries · select a heading to sort

Productive Capacities Index, 2009: every country, as published by UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
derived
1DenmarkDNKNorthern Europe70.7779.1031.5970.4579.9172.9097.7379.2079.23—
2AustraliaAUSAustralia and New Zealand69.8976.6939.6073.6570.7564.7592.0982.2373.40—
3NetherlandsNLDWestern Europe69.3065.1027.7976.4886.6172.6092.9780.3181.93—
4United StatesUSANorthern America68.6871.8926.0474.0978.2264.1783.7489.2395.17—
5GermanyDEUWestern Europe67.9373.2722.0973.2480.5271.9688.7780.9291.87—
6United KingdomGBRNorthern Europe67.3366.2929.8371.6177.2670.2585.9876.3583.73—
7New ZealandNZLAustralia and New Zealand66.5166.9131.3765.9181.0565.3995.8585.2963.90—
8NorwayNORNorthern Europe65.5270.6826.3168.2379.8370.8393.6281.3362.15—
9IrelandIRLNorthern Europe64.7265.4028.2374.0786.2562.4489.6473.2463.66—
10CanadaCANNorthern America64.4468.4426.9072.8354.2965.2393.0687.2377.16—
11BelgiumBELWestern Europe64.1870.3718.4975.4988.0065.0785.6072.0682.91—
12AustriaAUTWestern Europe64.0971.6219.6570.4576.8865.5890.5073.9185.11—
13LuxembourgLUXWestern Europe64.0863.4616.2884.8298.1673.9094.2676.2962.22—
14FranceFRAWestern Europe64.0567.4820.5669.3077.8465.8883.6574.1392.71—
15SwedenSWENorthern Europe63.7475.7115.3265.7387.9071.8295.8275.1878.60—
16FinlandFINNorthern Europe63.6783.6617.2971.5779.4568.7998.1769.6669.77—
17SwitzerlandCHEWestern Europe63.2170.7812.4873.6780.0972.7794.2683.0985.80—
18IcelandISLNorthern Europe62.0380.3522.7870.7584.7173.8789.7966.3245.44—
19QatarQATWestern Asia60.7536.9347.9981.1285.9249.6572.3060.5569.08—
20Hong KongHKGEastern Asia60.6957.9011.5579.5584.4673.1787.7593.6968.14Run-to-run variation exceeds +/- 1 index point
21SpainESPSouthern Europe60.5363.5322.8767.3070.2160.2375.2071.1381.46—
22South KoreaKOREastern Asia60.4774.8313.2275.7171.1966.6872.7388.3378.32—
23CzechiaCZEEastern Europe59.7259.4530.3269.1365.1958.9176.1657.4377.30—
24PortugalPRTSouthern Europe59.2065.9623.5864.7662.1657.0679.1172.2673.86—
25United Arab EmiratesAREWestern Asia59.0241.4235.3879.4778.4855.0866.5166.2166.39—

02In 2009

At either end

The 5 countries at each end of the headline, then the highest and lowest on each other measure.

Highest

  1. 1Denmark70.77
  2. 2Australia69.89
  3. 3Netherlands69.30
  4. 4United States68.68
  5. 5Germany67.93

Lowest

  1. 192Somalia11.18
  2. 191Chad15.17
  3. 190Central African Republic15.32
  4. 189Niger15.42
  5. 188DR Congo15.45

A higher value is the better result. The middle country reads 43.10. “Shared” marks a value another country also holds.

Each measure’s ends

032008 → 2009

Since 2008

What changed between 2008 and this one: who joined or left, and how far the headline moved.

  • +0 / −0countries joined / left
  • 191values changed, of 192 in both
  • 119 · 72rose · fell
  • 1unchanged

Rose most

Fell most

Both years come from the same release, so a difference here is a change in the data, not a revision of it. Every country’s full history is charted on the statistic page.

04Caveats

Read before you use

What this edition’s numbers are and are not, worked out from the file itself.

The site’s method
  • One year of the 2025 release

    Every year in this series comes from UNCTAD’s 2025 release, recalculated on one method. It can differ from what was first published for 2009.

  • 189 distinct values among 192

    Values are stored exactly as published, to 2 decimals. 2 countries share 43.76. Countries sharing a value share a position too.

  • The position is ours

    UNCTAD publishes values only. The order here sorts the published values, and the page says so wherever it prints one.

  • Which end is better

    A higher value is the better result.

  • 190 empty cells

    An empty cell means the publisher gave no figure. It is never a zero.

05The files

Download and cite

The table as a file, digit for digit, what this site changed, and a citation for this edition.

Licence in full

What this site changed: Reshaped into one row per country: regional and income-group totals are left out, only the columns listed are kept, each row gets its ISO 3166 code, and some country names are brought to one spelling. No value is recalculated, rescaled or rounded.

Licence: CC BY 3.0 IGO. The version of CC BY written for intergovernmental organisations. Credit the publisher and say what you changed.

Cite this edition

UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2009). Productive Capacities Index, 2009 [data set], describing 2009. As held by Nations Inquiry, https://nationsinquiry.com/datasets/productive-capacities-index/2009

0623 held

Other years

07Questions

Productive Capacities Index, 2009: questions and answers

Which country has the highest Productive Capacities Index in Productive Capacities Index, 2009?

Denmark, at 70.77, of the 192 countries in the file.

What year does Productive Capacities Index, 2009 describe?

2009.

How many countries does Productive Capacities Index, 2009 cover?

192.

Where can I download Productive Capacities Index, 2009?

On this page, as a CSV file holding every value exactly as published, or from the publisher’s own site, linked below.

Is Productive Capacities Index, 2009 the newest?

No. The newest held here is Productive Capacities Index, 2022.

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.