Skip to content
Nations Inquiry — home

Data for 2006

Productive Capacities Index, 2006

2006, as UNCTAD’s 2025 release gives it · stored as published, never rewritten

Productive Capacities Index, 2006 covers 190 countries on 9 measures. Denmark is highest, at 71.00; Somalia is lowest, at 12.27. The middle country reads 40.80. Against 2005, 189 values changed (172 up, 17 down), the same countries are covered.

Share

Productive Capacities Index · Data for 2006

HighestDenmark

71.00

LowestSomalia

12.27

Shaded by value in five groups of equal size, darkest at the better end. A higher value is the better result.

01Position · derived

The table

Every country and every column of Productive Capacities Index, 2006, as published. UNCTAD ranks nobody on this measure; the position is derived here by ordering the published values. “=” marks a shared position.

Showing 25 of 190 countries · select a heading to sort

Productive Capacities Index, 2006: every country, as published by UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD).
derived
1DenmarkDNKNorthern Europe71.0071.9233.9275.3079.2671.0398.0577.9181.73—
2AustraliaAUSAustralia and New Zealand69.3374.6640.3171.7070.6261.0691.3782.1376.48—
=3NetherlandsNLDWestern Europe68.6665.2527.9176.0289.3568.3492.7576.6882.15—
=3United StatesUSANorthern America68.6669.1327.9974.9281.3261.1285.4081.2698.74—
5IcelandISLNorthern Europe67.5582.0825.2869.6285.9471.8395.0782.2662.18—
6GermanyDEUWestern Europe66.6070.0721.8673.4980.2064.9490.5979.2691.96—
7IrelandIRLNorthern Europe66.5361.0934.1576.1487.7659.0091.2670.2472.81—
8United KingdomGBRNorthern Europe66.1064.8731.2973.2268.5464.7190.5370.1687.09—
9New ZealandNZLAustralia and New Zealand65.7064.6031.1466.2682.3957.5994.2786.2867.53—
10NorwayNORNorthern Europe64.8467.5726.8566.3180.4167.0093.6286.3859.59—
11CanadaCANNorthern America64.4767.3328.3374.1357.9960.8492.4882.7978.10—
12SwedenSWENorthern Europe63.8578.1416.6366.4282.8970.4793.9074.2478.60—
13FinlandFINNorthern Europe63.6481.5018.3472.5381.1365.7798.2068.6768.99—
14AustriaAUTWestern Europe63.5768.2919.9670.9179.7860.6492.7573.9383.18—
15FranceFRAWestern Europe62.9865.5420.8971.2178.6657.4884.9870.7393.35—
=16BelgiumBELWestern Europe62.9268.2018.8476.0683.5760.5385.2770.1983.01—
=16SwitzerlandCHEWestern Europe62.9269.3213.5673.3178.1967.9594.6481.7086.79—
18SpainESPSouthern Europe61.1260.9824.7268.3072.4756.5375.8169.9687.06—
19Hong KongHKGEastern Asia60.1855.0912.1479.9584.1966.8389.9089.3071.28Run-to-run variation exceeds +/- 1 index point
20LuxembourgLUXWestern Europe59.7761.3710.9385.7799.5968.1392.6072.6062.10—
21MaltaMLTSouthern Europe59.5954.1028.4166.0383.6453.1182.5381.2052.59—
22CzechiaCZEEastern Europe59.1657.1531.0369.5766.4853.9075.9657.5477.70—
23South KoreaKOREastern Asia58.9469.4913.3275.8768.2863.5070.6586.7478.02—
24EstoniaESTNorthern Europe58.8654.7830.0462.3764.1059.9579.8960.8775.12—
25ItalyITASouthern Europe58.7258.8121.6771.7267.1457.7669.7261.7892.56—

02In 2006

At either end

The 5 countries at each end of the headline, then the highest and lowest on each other measure.

Highest

  1. 1Denmark71.00
  2. 2Australia69.33
  3. 3Netherlandsshared68.66
  4. 3United Statesshared68.66
  5. 5Iceland67.55

Lowest

  1. 190Somalia12.27
  2. 189Chad12.89
  3. 188DR Congo13.63
  4. 187Niger14.00
  5. 186Central African Republic14.07

A higher value is the better result. The middle country reads 40.80. “Shared” marks a value another country also holds.

Each measure’s ends

032005 → 2006

Since 2005

What changed between 2005 and this one: who joined or left, and how far the headline moved.

  • +0 / −0countries joined / left
  • 189values changed, of 190 in both
  • 172 · 17rose · fell
  • 1unchanged

Rose most

Fell most

Both years come from the same release, so a difference here is a change in the data, not a revision of it. Every country’s full history is charted on the statistic page.

04Caveats

Read before you use

What this edition’s numbers are and are not, worked out from the file itself.

The site’s method
  • One year of the 2025 release

    Every year in this series comes from UNCTAD’s 2025 release, recalculated on one method. It can differ from what was first published for 2006.

  • 186 distinct values among 190

    Values are stored exactly as published, to 2 decimals. 2 countries share 68.66. Countries sharing a value share a position too.

  • The position is ours

    UNCTAD publishes values only. The order here sorts the published values, and the page says so wherever it prints one.

  • Which end is better

    A higher value is the better result.

  • 185 empty cells

    An empty cell means the publisher gave no figure. It is never a zero.

05The files

Download and cite

The table as a file, digit for digit, what this site changed, and a citation for this edition.

Licence in full

What this site changed: Reshaped into one row per country: regional and income-group totals are left out, only the columns listed are kept, each row gets its ISO 3166 code, and some country names are brought to one spelling. No value is recalculated, rescaled or rounded.

Licence: CC BY 3.0 IGO. The version of CC BY written for intergovernmental organisations. Credit the publisher and say what you changed.

Cite this edition

UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2006). Productive Capacities Index, 2006 [data set], describing 2006. As held by Nations Inquiry, https://nationsinquiry.com/datasets/productive-capacities-index/2006

0623 held

Other years

07Questions

Productive Capacities Index, 2006: questions and answers

Which country has the highest Productive Capacities Index in Productive Capacities Index, 2006?

Denmark, at 71.00, of the 190 countries in the file.

What year does Productive Capacities Index, 2006 describe?

2006.

How many countries does Productive Capacities Index, 2006 cover?

190.

Where can I download Productive Capacities Index, 2006?

On this page, as a CSV file holding every value exactly as published, or from the publisher’s own site, linked below.

Is Productive Capacities Index, 2006 the newest?

No. The newest held here is Productive Capacities Index, 2022.

Feedback

Feedback

How are we doing?

Two answers are required — a rating and your email. The rest is up to you.